Daveatt

Supertrend MTF Heatmap V2

Hello traders and aspiring Pinescripters

You might remember this script Supertrend-Heatmap-Multi-timeframes/ ?
A follower, asked me in a comment to do a version where YOU guys can select the timeframes
Well... what follower asks, follower (sometimes) gets. I'm not Santa Claus but this is Christmas with a few months in advance (#oh #oh #oh)
版本注释: - Fixed a small issue
版本注释: - Fixed the repainting issue. Does NOT repaint anymore
版本注释: - Added the lookahead=on parameter to the security calls
- Accounted for the "Same as Symbol" case
- Added some comments for more clarity
开源脚本

本着真正的TradingView精神,该脚本的作者将其开源发布,因此交易者可以理解和验证它。为作者加油! 您可以免费使用它,但是在发布中重复使用此代码受网站规则的约束。您可以收藏它以在图表上使用。

想在图表上使用此脚本?
💰 Results/Blogs: https://bit.ly/2ULUtjo

⏩ Signals/Pricing: https://best-trading-indicator.com/pages/pricing

🐦 Twitter: https://twitter.com/bti_trading

👉 Get a $30 discount on TradingView: https://bit.ly/2UM5OA0

📺 Youtube: https://bit.ly/3bKvnZu

评论

Hello sir,

Can u please add 1, 3 and 5min as well to script
+7 回复
Is that good to set it as "Lookahead=on"? Is it better not to enable it on your experience?
+4 回复
Daveatt BillionaireLau
@BillionaireLau, you're correct, when there is no indexing of source value? It's gonna generate lookahead bias on historical bars.
I learned a few months after that lookahead=on is useful for historical bars when the source is like this close, high etc ... basically with an index
+1 回复
I just came across your script and I am quit impressed by the fact that you did this just because someone asked for it. Thumbs up to you my friend,
+4 回复
Daveatt SkanderD
@SkanderD, Oh that's nice to hear :)
sharing is caring
+1 回复
this is so excellent!
thank you Daveatt.
+2 回复
Hello , nice effort and nice script !
+2 回复
Daveatt Noldo
@Noldo, Thanks a lot of the good words
+1 回复
Hello, great script, but supertrend works better if it is applied to heikin ashi bars, it is much more smoothed... could you do an HA alternative?
+2 回复
Is there an moving average indicator similar to this one?
+1 回复