EW Count Reconsideration
Hello friends!
Few months ago, I posted an idea that the low is likely to be put in around 500 SATS. Yet, this idea considered that Bitcoin will not trave as low as it did; this got me thinking... I took a break from the charts due to personal matters and after a while I removed all my analysis from the EOSBTC count.
The current count "fits" better. An extension within a three, which is a common occurrence, working on its way to put in a corrective four.
Where would the count be invalidated?
PA travels beyond 1.5 Fib extension in an impulsive manner
Few months ago, I posted an idea that the low is likely to be put in around 500 SATS. Yet, this idea considered that Bitcoin will not trave as low as it did; this got me thinking... I took a break from the charts due to personal matters and after a while I removed all my analysis from the EOSBTC count.
The current count "fits" better. An extension within a three, which is a common occurrence, working on its way to put in a corrective four.
Where would the count be invalidated?
PA travels beyond 1.5 Fib extension in an impulsive manner
免责声明
这些信息和出版物并非旨在提供，也不构成TradingView提供或认可的任何形式的财务、投资、交易或其他类型的建议或推荐。请阅读使用条款了解更多信息。
免责声明
这些信息和出版物并非旨在提供，也不构成TradingView提供或认可的任何形式的财务、投资、交易或其他类型的建议或推荐。请阅读使用条款了解更多信息。