Andre_Cardoso
教学

Harmonic Patterns Ratios 2016 // ®

FX:EURUSD   欧元/美元
20769浏览
318
20769 25
Check other #Educational charts:
https://www.tradingview.com/u/Trading_Ja...







Safe Trades
评论: The Cypher Video https://youtu.be/riuWLUQS5ds
评论: The Crab Video https://youtu.be/VG88uSprLX4
评论: The Butterfly Video https://youtu.be/aZnkAmvcSMo
评论: The Gartley Video - https://youtu.be/1BUjPdWHAHE

相关观点

1 Question, you have 2 images with different ratios (at least) on Bat C leg. The second says "38.2 - 88.6 AB" but the first says "at least 61.8 (must close below 88.6)". So what is an acceptable C leg? 61.8 and above ( to 88.6), anything from 38.2 to 88.6 or just the perfect ratios 38.2, 61.8, 88.6? Thank You for your time, and for the pictures!
+5 回复
that an excellent cheat sheet
回复
Thanks for sharing. A lot of valuable information from which we can all learn from.
回复
thanks a million! this is the cheat-sheet i was looking for!
回复
Andre_Cardoso DanielAnthony
;)
回复
shark pattern table has alot of flaws (i would say its just incorrect), but the rest seems correct. good work
回复
Andre_Cardoso SergeantPringles
- This is your most recent Shark pattern forecast, can you please update me? Please correct me if i'm wrong, i'm trading them a few years so far, so... post a chart with your ratios...
回复
Andre_Cardoso Andre_Cardoso
?
回复
SergeantPringles Andre_Cardoso
yup those are good and valid shark patterns. but the table is still wrong tho. first up - sharkpatterns are labeld differently than all the other pattern because the are part of the earlier found 5-0 pattern. thats why sharks start with 0 and the X point is where normaly A is(and so on from there - with completion at C) so abit false labeled in your table. in the table you also say B(which with the corrected labeling should be A) is 618, which isnt norm. and clearly (from your charts) you are workin with smaller retracments too. technically A doesnt need to have desired retracment level, but its hard to make the pattern work ratiowise if its much less than a 382. A(your B) is defined by the correction projection of B and C, so no retracment level required. and the 618 is certainly wrong. lastly your C point (normally B) doesnt need at least be a 1.13 XA(normmal 0X) but instead a 1.13 AB(normally XA - ironicly). its abit confusing to explain due to the false labeling. here a random chart i put together to showcase the correct labeling and to correct ratios. those ratios are based on the publications of the guy who found and named the pattern in the early 2000s - Scott Carney
回复
Andre_Cardoso SergeantPringles
Thanks.
Yes, i search for a deeper corrections for my point B, about 50% at least, if it gets closer the 61.8%, great. I believe a smaller correction like the 23% or 38% its a sign of an extended move arriving on next leg, and in this cases i will target the 127% or above it. About the Point C, normally i use the AB extension, but as you said, the market is tricky sometimes, and the XA extension is also an option. I know Steve Carney of course, and i'm already creating a Shark Pattern Special Guide, with those "corrections". Thank you
回复
首页 股票筛选器 外汇筛选器 加密货币筛选器 财经日历 如何运作 图表功能 价格 网站规则 版主 网站 & 经纪商解决方案 插件 图表解决方案 寻求帮助 功能请求 博客 & 新闻 常见问题 维基百科 Twitter
概述 个人资料设置 账号和账单 寻求帮助 已发表观点 粉丝 正在关注 私人消息 聊天 退出