INVITE-ONLY SCRIPT
Kinetic Elasticity Reversion System - Adaptive Genesis Engine
🧬 KERS-AGE - EVOLVED KINETIC ELASTICITY REVERSION SYSTEM
EDUCATIONAL GUIDE & THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
⚠️ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This indicator and guide are provided for educational and informational purposes only. This is NOT financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
Trading involves substantial risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance metrics, win rates, and examples shown are from historical backtesting and do not represent actual trading results. Always conduct your own research, paper trade extensively, and never risk capital you cannot afford to lose.
The developers assume no responsibility for any trading losses incurred through use of this indicator.
INTRODUCTION
KERS-AGE (Kinetic Elasticity Reversion System - Adaptive Genetic Evolution) represents an educational exploration of adaptive trading systems. Unlike traditional indicators with fixed parameters, KERS-AGE demonstrates a dynamic, evolving approach that adjusts to market conditions through genetic algorithms and machine learning techniques.
This guide explains the theoretical concepts, technical implementation, and educational examples of how the system operates.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Traditional Indicators vs. Adaptive Systems:
Traditional Indicators:
Fixed parameters
Single strategy approach
Static behavior
Designed for specific conditions
Require manual optimization
Adaptive System Approach (KERS-AGE):
Dynamic parameters (adjust based on conditions)
Multiple strategies tested simultaneously
Pattern recognition (cluster analysis)
Regime-aware (speciation)
Automated optimization (genetic algorithms)
Transparent operation (detailed dashboard)
CORE CONCEPTS EXPLAINED
1. THE ELASTICITY ANALOGY 🎯
The indicator models price behavior as if connected to a moving average by an elastic band:
Price extends away → Elastic tension builds → Potential reversion point identified
Key Measurements:
STRETCH: Distance from price to equilibrium (MA)
TENSION: Normalized force calculation
THRESHOLD: Point where multiple factors align
Theoretical Foundation:
Markets have historically shown mean-reverting tendencies around fair value. This concept quantifies the deviation and identifies potential reversal zones based on multiple confluence factors.
Mathematical Approach:
text
Tension Score = (Price Distance from MA) / (Band Width) × Volatility Scaling
Signal Threshold = Multiple of ATR × Dynamic Volatility Ratio
Confluence = Tension Score + Additional Factors
2. THE 6 SIGNAL TYPES 📊
The system recognizes 6 distinct pattern categories:
A. ELASTIC SIGNALS
Pattern: Price reaches statistical band extremes
Theory: Maximum deviation from mean suggests potential reversion
Detection: Price touches outer zones (typically 2-3× ATR from MA)
Component: Mathematical band extension measurement
Historical Context: Often observed in markets with clear swing patterns
B. WICK SIGNALS
Pattern: Extended rejection wicks on candles
Theory: Failed breakout attempts may indicate directional exhaustion
Detection: Upper/lower wick exceeding 2× body size
Component: Real-time price rejection measurement
Historical Context: Common in volatile conditions with rapid reversals
C. EXHAUSTION SIGNALS
Pattern: Decelerating momentum despite price extension
Theory: Velocity and acceleration divergence may precede reversals
Detection: Decreasing velocity with negative acceleration
Component: Momentum derivative analysis
Historical Context: Often seen at trend maturity points
D. CLIMAX SIGNALS
Pattern: Volume spike at price extreme
Theory: Unusual volume at extremes historically correlates with turning points
Detection: Volume 1.5-2.5× average at band extreme
Component: Volume-price relationship analysis
Historical Context: Associated with institutional activity or capitulation
E. STRUCTURE SIGNALS
Pattern: Fractal pivot formations (swing highs/lows)
Theory: Market structure points have historically acted as support/resistance
Detection: 2-4 bar pivot patterns
Component: Classical technical analysis
Historical Context: Universal across timeframes and markets
F. DIVERGENCE SIGNALS
Pattern: RSI divergence versus price
Theory: Momentum divergence has historically preceded price reversals
Detection: Price makes new extreme but RSI does not
Component: Oscillator divergence detection
Historical Context: Considered a leading indicator in technical analysis
Pattern Confluence:
Historical testing suggests stronger signals when multiple types align:
Elastic + Wick + Volume = Higher confluence score
Elastic + Exhaustion + Divergence = Multiple confirmation factors
Any 3+ types = Increased pattern strength
Note: Past pattern performance does not guarantee future occurrence.
3. REGIME DETECTION 🌍
The system attempts to classify market conditions into three behavioral regimes:
📈 TREND REGIME
Detection Methodology:
text
Efficiency Ratio = Net Movement / Total Movement
Classification: Efficiency > 0.5 AND Volatility < 1.3 → TREND
Characteristics Observed:
Directional price movement
Relatively lower volatility
Defined higher highs/lower lows
Persistent directional momentum
System Response:
Reduces signal frequency
Prioritizes trend-specialist strategies
Applies additional filtering to counter-trend signals
Increases confluence requirements
Educational Note:
In trending conditions, counter-trend mean reversion signals historically have shown reduced reliability. Users may consider additional confirmation when trend regime is detected.
↔️ RANGE REGIME
Detection Methodology:
text
Classification: Efficiency < 0.5 AND Volatility 0.9-1.4 → RANGE
Characteristics Observed:
Oscillating price action
Defined support/resistance zones
Mean-reverting behavior patterns
Relatively balanced directional flow
System Response:
Increases signal frequency
Activates range-specialist strategies
Adjusts bands relative to volatility
Reduces confluence threshold
Educational Note:
Historical backtesting suggests mean reversion systems have performed better in ranging conditions. This does not guarantee future performance.
🌊 VOLATILE REGIME
Detection Methodology:
text
Classification: DVS (Dynamic Volatility Scaling) > 1.5 → VOLATILE
Characteristics Observed:
Erratic price swings
Expanded ranges
Elevated ATR readings
Often news or event-driven
System Response:
Activates volatility-specialist strategies
Widens bands automatically
Prioritizes wick rejection signals
Emphasizes volume confirmation
Educational Note:
Volatile conditions historically present both opportunity and increased risk. Wider stops may be appropriate for risk management.
4. GENETIC EVOLUTION EXPLAINED 🧬
The system employs genetic algorithms to optimize parameters - an approach used in computational finance research.
The Evolution Process:
STEP 1: INITIALIZATION
text
Initial State: System creates 4 starter strategies
- Strategy 0: Range-optimized parameters
- Strategy 1: Trend-optimized parameters
- Strategy 2: Volatility-optimized parameters
- Strategy 3: Balanced parameters
Each contains 14 adjustable parameters (genes):
- Band sensitivity
- Extension multiplier
- Wick threshold
- Momentum threshold
- Volume multiplier
- Component weights (elastic, wick, momentum, volume, fractal)
- Target percentage
STEP 2: COMPETITION (Shadow Trading)
text
Early Bars: All strategies generate signals in parallel
- Each tracks hypothetical performance independently
- Simulated P&L, win rate, Sharpe ratio calculated
- No actual trades executed (educational simulation)
- Performance metrics recorded for analysis
STEP 3: FITNESS EVALUATION
text
Fitness Calculation =
0.25 × Win Rate +
0.25 × PnL Score +
0.15 × Drawdown Score +
0.30 × Sharpe Ratio Score +
0.05 × Trade Count Score
With Walk-Forward enabled:
Fitness = 0.60 × Test Score + 0.40 × Train Score
With Speciation enabled:
Fitness adjusted by Diversity Penalty
STEP 4: SELECTION (Tournament)
text
Periodically (default every 50 bars):
- Randomly select 4 active strategies
- Compare fitness scores
- Top 2 selected as "parents"
STEP 5: CROSSOVER (Breeding)
text
Parent 1 Fitness: 0.65
Parent 2 Fitness: 0.55
Weight calculation: 0.65/(0.65+0.55) = 54%
For each parameter:
Child Parameter = (0.54 × Parent1) + (0.46 × Parent2)
Example:
Band Sensitivity: (0.54 × 1.5) + (0.46 × 2.0) = 1.73
STEP 6: MUTATION
text
For each parameter:
if random(0-1) < Mutation Rate (default 0.15):
Add random variation: -12% to +12%
Purpose: Prevents premature convergence
Enables: Discovery of novel parameter combinations
ADAPTIVE MUTATION:
If population fitness converges → Mutation rate × 1.5
(Encourages exploration when diversity decreases)
STEP 7: INSERTION
text
New strategy added to population:
- Assigned unique ID number
- Generation counter incremented
- Begins shadow trading
- Competes with existing strategies
STEP 8: CULLING (Selection Pressure)
text
Periodically (default every 100 bars):
- Identify lowest fitness strategy
- Verify not elite (protected top performers)
- Verify not last of species
- Remove from population
Result: Maintains selection pressure
Effect: Prevents weak strategies from diluting signals
STEP 9: SIGNAL GENERATION LOGIC
text
When determining signals to display:
If Ensemble enabled:
- All strategies cast weighted votes
- Weights based on fitness scores
- Specialists receive boost in matching regime
- Signal generated if consensus threshold reached
If Ensemble disabled:
- Single highest-fitness strategy used
STEP 10: ADAPTATION OBSERVATION
text
Over time: Population characteristics may shift
- Lower-performing strategies removed
- Higher-performing strategies replicated
- Parameters adjust toward observed optima
- Fitness scores generally trend upward
Long-term: Population reaches maturity
- Strategies become specialized
- Parameters optimized for recent conditions
- Performance stabilizes
Educational Context:
Genetic algorithms are a recognized computational method for optimization problems. This implementation applies those concepts to trading parameter optimization. Past optimization results do not guarantee future performance.
5. SPECIATION (Niche Specialization) 🐟🦎🦅
Inspired by biological speciation theory applied to algorithmic trading.
The Three Species:
RANGE SPECIALISTS 📊
text
Optimized for: Sideways market conditions
Parameter tendencies:
- Tighter bands (1.0-1.5× ATR)
- Higher sensitivity to elastic stretch
- Emphasis on fractal structure
- More frequent signal generation
Typically emerge when:
- Range regime detected
- Clear support/resistance present
- Mean reversion showing historical success
Historical backtesting observations:
- Win rates often in 55-65% range
- Smaller reward/risk ratios (0.5-1.5R)
- Higher trade frequency
TREND SPECIALISTS 📈
text
Optimized for: Directional market conditions
Parameter tendencies:
- Wider bands (2.0-2.5× ATR)
- Focus on momentum exhaustion
- Emphasis on divergence patterns
- More selective signal generation
Typically emerge when:
- Trend regime detected
- Strong directional movement observed
- Counter-trend exhaustion signals sought
Historical backtesting observations:
- Win rates often in 40-55% range
- Larger reward/risk ratios (1.5-3.0R)
- Lower trade frequency
VOLATILITY SPECIALISTS 🌊
text
Optimized for: High-volatility conditions
Parameter tendencies:
- Expanded bands (1.5-2.0× ATR)
- Priority on wick rejection patterns
- Strong volume confirmation requirement
- Very selective signals
Typically emerge when:
- Volatile regime detected
- High DVS ratio (>1.5)
- News-driven or event-driven conditions
Historical backtesting observations:
- Win rates often in 50-60% range
- Variable reward/risk ratios (1.0-2.5R)
- Opportunistic trade timing
Species Protection Mechanism:
text
Minimum Per Species: Configurable (default 2)
If Range specialists = 1:
→ Preferential spawning of Range type
→ Protection from culling process
Purpose: Ensures coverage across regime types
Theory: Markets cycle between behavioral states
Goal: Prevent extinction of specialized approaches
Fitness Sharing:
text
If Species has 4 members:
Individual Fitness × 1 / (4 ^ 0.3)
Individual Fitness × 0.72
Purpose: Creates pressure toward species diversity
Effect: Prevents single approach from dominating population
Educational Note: Speciation is a theoretical framework for maintaining strategy diversity. Past specialization performance does not guarantee future regime classification accuracy or signal quality.
6. WALK-FORWARD VALIDATION 📈
An out-of-sample testing methodology used in quantitative research to reduce overfitting risk.
The Overfitting Problem:
text
Hypothetical Example:
In-Sample Backtest: 85% win rate
Out-of-Sample Results: 35% win rate
Explanation: Strategy may have optimized to historical noise
rather than repeatable patterns
Walk-Forward Methodology:
Timeline Structure:
text
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Train Window │ Test Window │ Train │ Test │
│ (200 bars) │ (50 bars) │ (200) │ (50) │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
In-Sample Out-of-Sample IS OOS
(Optimize) (Validate) Cycle 2...
TRAIN PHASE (In-Sample):
text
Example Bars 1-200: Strategies optimize parameters
- Performance tracked
- Not yet used for primary fitness
- Learning period
TEST PHASE (Out-of-Sample):
text
Example Bars 201-250: Strategies use optimized parameters
- Performance tracked separately
- Validation period
- Out-of-sample evaluation
FITNESS CALCULATION EXAMPLE:
text
Train Win Rate: 65%
Test Win Rate: 58%
Composite Fitness:
= (0.40 × 0.65) + (0.60 × 0.58)
= 0.26 + 0.35
= 0.61
Note: Test results weighted 60%, Train 40%
Theory: Out-of-sample may better indicate forward performance
OVERFIT DETECTION MECHANISM:
text
Gap = Train WR - Test WR = 65% - 58% = 7%
If Gap > Overfit Threshold (default 25%):
Fitness Penalty = Gap × 2
Example with 30% gap:
Strategy shows: Train 70%, Test 40%
Gap: 30% → Potential overfit flagged
Penalty: 30% × 2 = 60% fitness reduction
Result: Strategy likely to be culled
WINDOW ROLLING:
text
Example Bar 250: Test window complete
→ Reset both windows
→ Start new cycle
→ Previous results retained for analysis
Cycle Count increments
Historical performance tracked across multiple cycles
Educational Context:
Walk-forward analysis is a recognized approach in quantitative finance research for evaluating strategy robustness. However, past out-of-sample performance does not guarantee future results. Market conditions can change in ways not represented in historical data.
7. CLUSTER ANALYSIS 🔬
An unsupervised machine learning approach for pattern recognition.
The Concept:
text
Scenario: System identifies a price pivot that wasn't signaled
→ Extract pattern characteristics
→ Store features for analysis
→ Adjust detection for similar future patterns
Implementation:
STEP 1: FEATURE EXTRACTION
text
When significant move occurs without signal:
Extract 5-dimensional feature vector:
Feature Vector = [
Elastic Score (0-2),
Wick Score (0-2),
Momentum Score (0-2),
Pressure Score (0-1),
Regime (0-2)
]
Example:
Observed Pattern: [1.2, 0.8, 1.5, 0.4, 1]
STEP 2: CLUSTER ASSIGNMENT
text
Compare to existing cluster centroids using distance metric:
Cluster 0: [0.8, 0.5, 1.2, 0.3, 0]
Cluster 1: [1.5, 1.2, 0.8, 0.5, 1] ← Minimum distance
Cluster 2: [1.0, 1.8, 1.1, -0.2, 2]
...
Assign to nearest cluster
STEP 3: CENTROID UPDATE
text
Old Centroid 1: [1.5, 1.2, 0.8, 0.5, 1]
New Pattern: [1.2, 0.8, 1.5, 0.4, 1]
Decay Rate: 0.95
Updated Centroid:
= 0.95 × Old + 0.05 × New
= Exponential moving average update
= [1.485, 1.18, 0.835, 0.495, 1.0]
STEP 4: PROFIT TRACKING
text
Cluster Average Profit (hypothetical):
Old Average: 2.5R
New Observation: 3.2R
Updated: 0.95 × 2.5 + 0.05 × 3.2 = 2.535R
STEP 5: LEARNING ADJUSTMENT
text
If Cluster Average Profit > Threshold (e.g., 2.0R):
Cluster Learning Boost += increment (e.g., 0.1)
(Maximum cap: 2.0)
Effect: Future signals resembling this cluster receive adjustment
STEP 6: SCORE MODIFICATION
text
For signals matching cluster characteristics:
Base Score × Cluster Learning Boost
Example:
Base Score: 5.2
Cluster Boost: 1.3
Adjusted Score: 5.2 × 1.3 = 6.76
Result: Pattern more likely to generate signal
Cluster Interpretation Example:
text
CLUSTER 0: "High elastic, low volume"
Centroid: [1.8, 0.5, 0.6, 0.2, 0]
Avg Profit: 3.5R (historical backtest)
Interpretation: Pure elastic signals in ranges historically favorable
CLUSTER 1: "Wick rejection, volatile"
Centroid: [0.8, 1.9, 1.0, -0.3, 2]
Avg Profit: 2.8R (historical backtest)
Interpretation: Wick signals in volatility showed positive results
CLUSTER 2: "Exhaustion divergence"
Centroid: [1.2, 0.7, 1.8, 0.6, 1]
Avg Profit: 4.2R (historical backtest)
Interpretation: Momentum exhaustion in trends performed well
Learning Progress Metrics:
text
Missed Total: 47
Clusters Updated: 142
Patterns Learned: 28
Interpretation:
- System identified 47 significant moves without signals
- Clusters updated 142 times (incremental refinement)
- Made 28 parameter adjustments
- Theoretically improving pattern recognition
Educational Note: Cluster analysis is a recognized machine learning technique. This implementation applies it to trading pattern recognition. Past cluster performance does not guarantee future pattern profitability or accurate classification.
8. ENSEMBLE VOTING 🗳️
A collective decision-making approach common in machine learning.
The Wisdom of Crowds Concept:
text
Single Model:
- May have blind spots
- Subject to individual bias
- Limited perspective
Ensemble of Models:
- Blind spots may offset
- Biases may average out
- Multiple perspectives considered
Implementation:
STEP 1: INDIVIDUAL VOTES
text
Example Bar 247:
Strategy 0 (Range): LONG (fitness: 0.65)
Strategy 1 (Trend): FLAT (fitness: 0.58)
Strategy 2 (Volatile): LONG (fitness: 0.52)
Strategy 3 (Balanced): SHORT (fitness: 0.48)
Strategy 4 (Range): LONG (fitness: 0.71)
Strategy 5 (Trend): FLAT (fitness: 0.55)
STEP 2: WEIGHT CALCULATION
text
Base Weight = Fitness Score
If strategy's species matches current regime:
Weight × Specialist Boost (configurable, default 1.5)
If strategy has recent positive performance:
Weight × Recent Performance Factor
Example for Strategy 0:
Base: 0.65
Range specialist in Range regime: 0.65 × 1.5 = 0.975
Recent performance adjustment: 0.975 × 1.13 = 1.10
STEP 3: WEIGHTED TALLYING
text
LONG votes:
S0: 1.10 + S2: 0.52 + S4: 0.71 = 2.33
SHORT votes:
S3: 0.48 = 0.48
FLAT votes:
S1: 0.58 + S5: 0.55 = 1.13
Total Weight: 2.33 + 0.48 + 1.13 = 3.94
STEP 4: CONSENSUS CALCULATION
text
LONG %: 2.33 / 3.94 = 59.1%
SHORT %: 0.48 / 3.94 = 12.2%
FLAT %: 1.13 / 3.94 = 28.7%
Minimum Consensus Setting: 60%
Result: NO SIGNAL (59.1% < 60%)
STEP 5: SIGNAL DETERMINATION
text
If LONG % >= Min Consensus:
→ Display LONG signal
→ Show consensus percentage in dashboard
If SHORT % >= Min Consensus:
→ Display SHORT signal
If neither threshold reached:
→ No signal displayed
Practical Examples:
text
Strong Consensus (85%):
5 strategies LONG, 0 SHORT, 1 FLAT
→ High agreement among models
Moderate Consensus (62%):
3 LONG, 2 SHORT, 1 FLAT
→ Borderline agreement
No Consensus (48%):
3 LONG, 2 SHORT, 1 FLAT
→ Insufficient agreement, no signal shown
Educational Note: Ensemble methods are widely used in machine learning to improve model robustness. This implementation applies ensemble concepts to trading signals. Past ensemble performance does not guarantee future signal quality or profitability.
9. THOMPSON SAMPLING 🎲
A Bayesian reinforcement learning technique for balancing exploration and exploitation.
The Exploration-Exploitation Dilemma:
text
EXPLOITATION: Use what appears to work
Benefit: Leverages observed success patterns
Risk: May miss better alternatives
EXPLORATION: Try less-tested approaches
Benefit: May discover superior methods
Risk: May waste resources on inferior options
Thompson Sampling Solution:
STEP 1: BETA DISTRIBUTIONS
text
For each signal type, maintain:
Alpha = Successes + 1
Beta = Failures + 1
Example for Elastic signals:
15 wins, 10 losses
Alpha = 16, Beta = 11
STEP 2: PROBABILITY SAMPLING
text
Rather than using simple Win Rate = 15/25 = 60%
Sample from Beta(16, 11) distribution:
Possible samples: 0.55, 0.62, 0.58, 0.64, 0.59...
Rationale: Incorporates uncertainty
- Type with 5 trades: High uncertainty, wide sample variation
- Type with 50 trades: Lower uncertainty, narrow sample range
STEP 3: TYPE PRIORITIZATION
text
Example Bar 248:
Elastic sampled: 0.62
Wick sampled: 0.58
Exhaustion sampled: 0.71 ← Highest this sample
Climax sampled: 0.52
Structure sampled: 0.63
Divergence sampled: 0.45
Exhaustion type receives temporary boost
STEP 4: SIGNAL ADJUSTMENT
text
If current signal is Exhaustion type:
Score × (0.7 + 0.71 × 0.6)
Score × 1.126
If current signal is other type with lower sample:
Score × (0.7 + sample × 0.6)
(smaller adjustment)
STEP 5: OUTCOME FEEDBACK
text
When trade completes:
If WIN:
Alpha += 1
(Beta unchanged)
If LOSS:
Beta += 1
(Alpha unchanged)
Effect: Shifts probability distribution for future samples
Educational Context:
Thompson Sampling is a recognized Bayesian approach to the multi-armed bandit problem. This implementation applies it to signal type selection. The mathematical optimality assumes stationary distributions, which may not hold in financial markets. Past sampling performance does not guarantee future type selection accuracy.
10. DYNAMIC VOLATILITY SCALING (DVS) 📉
An adaptive approach where parameters adjust based on current vs. baseline volatility.
The Adaptation Problem:
text
Fixed bands (e.g., always 1.5 ATR):
In low volatility environment (vol = 0.5):
Bands may be too wide → fewer signals
In high volatility environment (vol = 2.0):
Bands may be too tight → excessive signals
The DVS Approach:
STEP 1: BASELINE ESTABLISHMENT
text
Calculate volatility over baseline period (default 100 bars):
Method options: ATR / Close, Parkinson, or Garman-Klass
Example average volatility = 1.2%
This represents "normal" for recent conditions
STEP 2: CURRENT VOLATILITY
text
Current bar volatility = 1.8%
STEP 3: DVS RATIO
text
DVS Ratio = Current / Baseline
= 1.8 / 1.2
= 1.5
Interpretation: Volatility currently 50% above baseline
STEP 4: BAND ADJUSTMENT
text
Base Band Width: 1.5 ATR
Adjusted Band Width:
Upper: 1.5 × DVS = 1.5 × 1.5 = 2.25 ATR
Lower: Same
Result: Bands expand 50% to accommodate higher volatility
STEP 5: THRESHOLD ADJUSTMENT
text
Base Thresholds:
Wick: 0.15
Momentum: 0.6
Adjusted:
Wick: 0.15 / DVS = 0.10 (easier to trigger in high vol)
Momentum: 0.6 × DVS = 0.90 (harder to trigger in high vol)
DVS Calculation Methods:
text
ATR RATIO (Simplest):
DVS = (ATR / Close) / SMA(ATR / Close, 100)
PARKINSON (Range-based):
σ = √(∑(ln(H/L))² / (4×n×ln(2)))
DVS = Current σ / Baseline σ
GARMAN-KLASS (Comprehensive):
σ = √(0.5×(ln(H/L))² - (2×ln(2)-1)×(ln(C/O))²)
DVS = Current σ / Baseline σ
ENSEMBLE (Robust):
DVS = Median(ATR_Ratio, Parkinson, Garman_Klass)
Educational Note: Dynamic volatility scaling is an approach to normalize indicators across varying market conditions. The effectiveness depends on the assumption that recent volatility patterns continue, which is not guaranteed. Past volatility adjustment performance does not guarantee future normalization accuracy.
11. PRESSURE KERNEL 💪
A composite measurement attempting to quantify directional force beyond simple price movement.
Components:
1. CLOSE LOCATION VALUE (CLV)
text
CLV = ((Close - Low) - (High - Close)) / Range
Examples:
Close at top of range: CLV = +1.0 (bullish position)
Close at midpoint: CLV = 0.0 (neutral)
Close at bottom: CLV = -1.0 (bearish position)
2. WICK ASYMMETRY
text
Wick Pressure = (Lower Wick - Upper Wick) / Range
Additional factors:
If Lower Wick > Body × 2: +0.3 (rejection boost)
If Upper Wick > Body × 2: -0.3 (rejection penalty)
3. BODY MOMENTUM
text
Body Ratio = Body Size / Range
Body Momentum = Close > Open ? +Body Ratio : -Body Ratio
Strong bullish candle: +0.9
Weak bullish candle: +0.2
Doji: 0.0
4. PATH ESTIMATE
text
Close Position = (Close - Low) / Range
Open Position = (Open - Low) / Range
Path = Close Position - Open Position
Additional adjustments:
If closed high with lower wick: +0.2
If closed low with upper wick: -0.2
5. MOMENTUM CONFIRMATION
text
Price Change / ATR
Examples:
+1.5 ATR move: +1.0 (capped)
+0.5 ATR move: +0.5
-0.8 ATR move: -0.8
COMPOSITE CALCULATION:
text
Pressure =
CLV × 0.25 +
Wick Pressure × 0.25 +
Body Momentum × 0.20 +
Path Estimate × 0.15 +
Momentum Confirm × 0.15
Volume context applied:
If Volume > 1.5× avg: × 1.3
If Volume < 0.5× avg: × 0.7
Final smoothing: 3-period EMA
Pressure Interpretation:
text
Pressure > 0.3: Suggests buying pressure
→ May support LONG signals
→ May reduce SHORT signal strength
Pressure < -0.3: Suggests selling pressure
→ May support SHORT signals
→ May reduce LONG signal strength
-0.3 to +0.3: Neutral range
→ Minimal directional bias
Educational Note: The Pressure Kernel is a custom composite indicator combining multiple price action metrics. These weightings are theoretical constructs. Past pressure readings do not guarantee future directional movement or signal quality.
USAGE GUIDE - EDUCATIONAL EXAMPLES
Getting Started:
STEP 1: Add Indicator
Open TradingView
Add KERS-AGE to chart
Allow minimum 100 bars for initialization
Verify dashboard displays Gen: 1+
STEP 2: Initial Observation Period
text
First 200 bars:
- System is in learning phase
- Signal frequency typically low
- Population evolution occurring
- Fitness scores generally increasing
Recommendation: Observe without trading during initialization
STEP 3: Signal Evaluation Criteria
text
Consider evaluating signals based on:
- Confidence percentage
- Grade assignment (A+, A, B+, B, C)
- Position within bands
- Historical win rate shown in dashboard
- Train vs. Test performance gap
Example Signal Evaluation Checklist:
Educational Criteria to Consider:
Signal appeared (⚡ arrow displayed)
Confidence level meets personal threshold
Grade meets personal quality standard
Ensemble consensus (if enabled) meets threshold
Historical win rate acceptable
Test performance reasonable vs. Train
Price location at band extreme
Regime classification appropriate for strategy
If trending: Signal direction aligns with personal analysis
Stop loss distance acceptable for risk tolerance
Position size appropriate (example: 1-2% account risk)
Note: This is an educational checklist, not trading advice. Users should develop their own criteria based on personal risk tolerance and strategy.
Risk Management Educational Examples:
POSITION SIZING EXAMPLE:
text
Hypothetical scenario:
Account: $10,000
Risk tolerance: 1.5% per trade = $150
Indicated stop distance: 1.5 ATR = $300 per contract
Calculation: $150 / $300 = 0.5 contracts
This is an educational example only, not a recommendation.
STOP LOSS EXAMPLES:
text
System provides stop level (red line)
Typically calculated as 1.5 ATR from entry
Alternative approaches users might consider:
LONG: Below recent swing low
SHORT: Above recent swing high
Users should determine stops based on personal risk management.
TAKE PROFIT EXAMPLES:
text
System provides target level (green line)
Typically calculated as price stretch × 60%
Alternative approaches users might consider:
Scale out: Partial exit at 1R, remainder at 2R
Trailing stop: Adjust stop after profit threshold
Users should determine targets based on personal strategy.
Educational Note: These are theoretical examples for educational purposes. Actual position sizing and risk management should be determined by each user based on their individual risk tolerance, account size, and trading plan.
OPTIMIZATION BY MARKET TYPE - EDUCATIONAL SUGGESTIONS
RANGE-BOUND MARKETS
Suggested Settings for Testing:
Population Size: 6-8
Min Confluence: 5.0-6.0
Min Consensus: 70%
Enable Speciation: Consider enabling
Min Per Species: 2
Theoretical Rationale:
More strategies may provide better coverage
Moderate confluence may generate more signals
Higher consensus may filter quality
Speciation may encourage range specialist emergence
Historical Backtest Observations:
Win rates in testing: Varied, often 50-65% range
Reward/risk ratios observed: 0.5-1.5R
Signal frequency: Relatively frequent
Disclaimer: Past backtesting results do not guarantee future performance.
TRENDING MARKETS
Suggested Settings for Testing:
Population Size: 4-5
Min Confluence: 6.0-7.0
Consider enabling MTF filter
MTF Timeframe: 3-5× current timeframe
Specialist Boost: 1.8-2.0
Theoretical Rationale:
Fewer strategies may adapt faster
Higher confluence may filter counter-trend noise
MTF may reduce counter-trend signals
Specialist boost may prioritize trend specialists
Historical Backtest Observations:
Win rates in testing: Varied, often 40-55% range
Reward/risk ratios observed: 1.5-3.0R
Signal frequency: Less frequent
Disclaimer: Past backtesting results do not guarantee future performance.
VOLATILE MARKETS (e.g., Cryptocurrency)
Suggested Settings for Testing:
Base Length: 25-30
Band Multiplier: 1.8-2.0
DVS: Consider enabling (Ensemble method)
Consider enabling Volume Filter
Volume Multiplier: 1.5-2.0
Theoretical Rationale:
Longer base may smooth noise
Wider bands may accommodate larger swings
DVS may be critical for adaptation
Volume filter may confirm genuine moves
Historical Backtest Observations:
Win rates in testing: Varied, often 45-60% range
Reward/risk ratios observed: 1.0-2.5R
Signal frequency: Moderate
Disclaimer: Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and risky. Past backtesting results do not guarantee future performance.
SCALPING (1-5min timeframes)
Suggested Settings for Testing:
Base Length: 15-20
Train Window: 150
Test Window: 30
Spawn Interval: 30
Min Confluence: 5.5-6.5
Consider enabling Ensemble
Min Consensus: 75%
Theoretical Rationale:
Shorter base may increase responsiveness
Shorter windows may speed evolution cycles
Quick spawning may enable rapid adaptation
Higher confluence may filter noise
Ensemble may reduce false signals
Historical Backtest Observations:
Win rates in testing: Varied, often 50-65% range
Reward/risk ratios observed: 0.5-1.0R
Signal frequency: Frequent but filtered
Disclaimer: Scalping involves high frequency trading with increased transaction costs and slippage risk. Past backtesting results do not guarantee future performance.
SWING TRADING (4H-Daily timeframes)
Suggested Settings for Testing:
Base Length: 25-35
Train Window: 300
Test Window: 100
Population Size: 7-8
Consider enabling Walk-Forward
Cooldown: 8-10 bars
Theoretical Rationale:
Longer timeframe may benefit from longer lookbacks
Larger windows may improve robustness testing
More population may increase stability
Walk-forward may be valuable for multi-day holds
Longer cooldown may reduce overtrading
Historical Backtest Observations:
Win rates in testing: Varied, often 45-60% range
Reward/risk ratios observed: 2.0-4.0R
Signal frequency: Infrequent but potentially higher quality
Disclaimer: Swing trading involves overnight and weekend risk. Past backtesting results do not guarantee future performance.
DASHBOARD GUIDE - INTERPRETATION EXAMPLES
Reading Each Section:
HEADER:
text
🧬 KERS-AGE EVOLVED 📈 TREND
Regime indication:
Color coding suggests current classification
(Green = Range, Orange = Trend, Purple = Volatile)
POPULATION:
text
Pop: 6/6
Gen: 42
Interpretation:
- Population at target size
- System at generation 42
- May indicate mature evolution
SPECIES (if enabled):
text
R:2 T:3 V:1
Interpretation:
- 2 Range specialists
- 3 Trend specialists
- 1 Volatility specialist
In TREND regime this distribution may be expected
WALK-FORWARD (if enabled):
text
Phase: 🧪 TEST
Cycles: 5
Train: 65%
Test: 58%
Considerations:
- Currently in test phase
- Completed 5 full cycles
- 7% performance gap between train and test
- Gap under default 25% overfit threshold
ENSEMBLE (if enabled):
text
Vote: 🟢 LONG
Consensus: 72%
Interpretation:
- Weighted majority voting LONG
- 72% agreement level
- Exceeds default 60% consensus threshold
SELECTED STRATEGY:
text
ID:23 [T]
Trades: 47
Win%: 58%
P&L: +8.3R
Fitness: 0.62
Information displayed:
- Strategy ID 23, Trend specialist
- 47 historical simulated trades
- 58% historical win rate
- +8.3R historical cumulative reward/risk
- 0.62 fitness score
Note: These are historical simulation metrics
SIGNAL QUALITY:
text
Conf: 78%
Grade: B+
Elastic: ████████░░
Wick: ██████░░░░
Momentum: ███████░░░
Pressure: ███████░░░
Information displayed:
- 78% confluence score
- B+ grade assignment
- Elastic component strongest
- Visual representation of component strengths
LEARNING (if enabled):
text
Missed: 47
Learned: 28
Interpretation:
- System identified 47 moves without signals
- 28 pattern adjustments made
- Suggests ongoing learning process
POSITION:
text
POS: 🟢 LONG
Score: 7.2
Current state:
- Simulated long position active
- 7.2 confluence score
- Monitor for potential exit signal
Educational Note: Dashboard displays are for informational and educational purposes. All performance metrics are historical simulations and do not represent actual trading results or future expectations.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS - EDUCATIONAL RESPONSES
Q: Why aren't signals showing?
A: Several factors may affect signal generation:
System may still be initializing (check Gen: counter)
Confluence score may be below threshold
Ensemble consensus (if enabled) may be below requirement
Current regime may naturally produce fewer signals
Filters may be active (volume, noise reduction)
Consider adjusting settings or allowing more time for evolution.
Q: The win rate seems low compared to backtesting?
A: Consider these factors:
First 200 bars typically represent learning period
Focus on TEST % rather than TRAIN % for realistic expectations
Trend regime historically shows 40-55% win rates in backtesting
Different market conditions may affect performance
System emphasizes reward/risk ratio alongside win rate
Past performance does not guarantee future results
Q: Should I take all signals?
A: This is a personal decision. Some users may consider:
Taking higher grades (A+, A) in any regime
Being more selective in trend regimes
Requiring higher ensemble consensus
Only trading during specific regimes
Paper trading extensively before live trading
Each user should develop their own signal selection criteria.
Q: Signals appear then disappear?
A: This may be expected behavior:
Default requires 2-bar persistence
Designed to filter brief spikes
Confirmation delay intended to reduce false signals
Wait for persistence requirement to be met
This is an intentional feature, not a malfunction.
Q: Test % much lower than Train %?
A: This may indicate:
Overfit detection system functioning
Gap exceeding threshold triggers penalty
Strategy may be optimizing to in-sample noise
System designed to cull such strategies
Walk-forward protection working as intended
This is a safety feature to reduce overfitting risk.
Q: The population keeps culling strategies?
A: This is part of normal evolution:
Lower-performing strategies removed periodically
Higher-performing strategies replicate
Population quality theoretically improves over time
Total culled count shows selection pressure
This is expected evolutionary behavior.
Q: Which timeframe works best?
A: Backtesting suggests 15min to 4H may be suitable ranges:
Lower timeframes may be noisier, may need more filtering
Higher timeframes may produce fewer signals
Extensive historical testing recommended for chosen asset
Each asset may behave differently
Consider paper trading across multiple timeframes
Personal testing is recommended for your specific use case.
Q: Does it work on all asset types?
A: Historical testing suggests:
Cryptocurrency: Consider longer Base Length (25-30) due to volatility
Forex: Standard settings may be appropriate starting point
Stocks: Standard settings, possibly smaller population (4-5)
Indices: Trend-focused settings may be worth testing
Each asset class has unique characteristics. Extensive testing recommended.
Q: Can settings be changed after initialization?
A: Yes, but considerations:
Population will reset
Strategies restart evolution
Learning progress resets
Consider testing new settings on separate chart first
May want to compare performance before committing
Settings changes restart the evolutionary process.
Q: Walk-Forward enabled or disabled?
A: Educational perspective:
Walk-Forward adds out-of-sample validation
May reduce overfitting risk
Results may be more conservative
Considered best practice in quantitative research
Requires more bars for meaningful data
Recommended for those concerned about robustness
Individual users should assess based on their needs.
Q: Ensemble mode or single strategy?
A: Trade-offs to consider:
Ensemble approach:
Requires consensus threshold
May have higher consistency
Typically fewer signals
Multiple perspectives considered
Single strategy approach:
More signals (varying quality)
Faster response to conditions
Higher variability
More active signal generation
Personal preference and risk tolerance should guide this choice.
ADVANCED CONSIDERATIONS
Evolution Time: Consider allowing 200+ bars for population maturity
Regime Awareness: Historical performance varies by regime classification
Confluence Range: Testing suggests 70-85% may be informative range
Ensemble Levels: 80%+ consensus historically associated with stronger agreement
Out-of-Sample Focus: Test performance may be more indicative than train performance
Learning Metrics: "Learned" count shows pattern adjustment over time
Pressure Levels: >0.4 pressure historically added confirmation
DVS Monitoring: >1.5 DVS typically widens bands and affects frequency
Species Balance: Healthy distribution might be 2-2-2 or 3-2-1, avoid 6-0-0
Timeframe Testing: Match to personal trading style, test thoroughly
Volume Importance: May be more critical for stocks/crypto than forex
MTF Utility: Historically more impactful in trending conditions
Grade Significance: A+ in trend regime historically rare and potentially significant
Risk Parameters: Standard risk management suggests 1-2% per trade maximum
Stop Levels: System stops are pre-calculated, widening may affect reward/risk
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
Genetic Algorithms in Finance:
Traditional Optimization Approaches:
Grid search: Exhaustive but computationally expensive
Gradient descent: Efficient but prone to local optima
Random search: Simple but inefficient
Genetic Algorithm Characteristics:
Explores parameter space through evolutionary process
Balances exploration (mutation) and exploitation (selection)
Mitigates local optima through population diversity
Parallel evaluation via population approach
Inspired by biological evolution principles
Academic Context: Genetic algorithms are studied in computational finance literature for parameter optimization. Effectiveness varies based on problem characteristics and implementation.
Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning:
Single Model Limitations:
May overfit to specific patterns
Can have blind spots in certain conditions
May be brittle to distribution shifts
Ensemble Theoretical Benefits:
Variance reduction through averaging
Robustness through diversity
Improved generalization potential
Widely used (Random Forests, Gradient Boosting, etc.)
Academic Context: Ensemble methods are well-studied in machine learning literature. Performance benefits depend on base model diversity and correlation structure.
Walk-Forward Analysis:
Alternative Approaches:
Simple backtest: Risk of overfitting to full dataset
Single train/test split: Limited validation
Cross-validation: May violate time-series properties
Walk-Forward Characteristics:
Continuous out-of-sample validation
Respects temporal ordering
Attempts to detect strategy degradation
Used in quantitative trading research
Academic Context: Walk-forward analysis is discussed in quantitative finance literature as a robustness check. However, it assumes future regimes will resemble recent test periods, which is not guaranteed.
FINAL EDUCATIONAL SUMMARY
KERS-AGE demonstrates an adaptive systems approach to technical analysis. Rather than fixed rules, it implements:
✓ Evolutionary Optimization: Parameter adaptation through genetic algorithms
✓ Regime Classification: Attempted market condition categorization
✓ Out-of-Sample Testing: Walk-forward validation methodology
✓ Pattern Recognition: Cluster analysis and learning systems
✓ Ensemble Methodology: Collective decision-making framework
✓ Full Transparency: Comprehensive dashboard and metrics
This indicator is an educational tool demonstrating advanced algorithmic concepts.
Critical Reminders:
The system:
✓ Attempts to identify potential reversal patterns
✓ Adapts parameters to changing conditions
✓ Provides multiple filtering mechanisms
✓ Offers detailed performance metrics
Users must understand:
✓ No system guarantees profitable results
✓ Past performance does not predict future results
✓ Extensive testing and validation recommended
✓ Risk management is user's responsibility
✓ Market conditions can change unpredictably
✓ This is educational software, not financial advice
Success in trading requires: Proper education, risk management, discipline, realistic expectations, and personal responsibility for all trading decisions.
For Educational Use
🧬 KERS-AGE Development Team
⚠️ FINAL DISCLAIMER
This indicator and documentation are provided strictly for educational and informational purposes.
NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE: Nothing in this guide constitutes financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or any recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or to engage in any trading strategy.
NO GUARANTEES: No representation is made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown in backtests, examples, or historical data. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
SUBSTANTIAL RISK: Trading stocks, forex, futures, options, and cryptocurrencies involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you.
YOUR RESPONSIBILITY: You are solely responsible for your own investment and trading decisions. You should conduct your own research, perform your own analysis, and consult with qualified financial advisors before making any trading decisions.
NO LIABILITY: The developers, contributors, and distributors of this indicator disclaim all liability for any losses or damages, direct or indirect, that may result from use of this indicator or reliance on any information provided.
PAPER TRADE FIRST: Users are strongly encouraged to thoroughly test this indicator in a paper trading environment before risking any real capital.
By using this indicator, you acknowledge that you have read this disclaimer, understand the risks involved in trading, and agree that you are solely responsible for your own trading decisions and their outcomes.
Educational Software Only | Trade at Your Own Risk | Not Financial Advice
Taking you to school. — Dskyz, Trade with insight. Trade with anticipation.
EDUCATIONAL GUIDE & THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
⚠️ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This indicator and guide are provided for educational and informational purposes only. This is NOT financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
Trading involves substantial risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance metrics, win rates, and examples shown are from historical backtesting and do not represent actual trading results. Always conduct your own research, paper trade extensively, and never risk capital you cannot afford to lose.
The developers assume no responsibility for any trading losses incurred through use of this indicator.
INTRODUCTION
KERS-AGE (Kinetic Elasticity Reversion System - Adaptive Genetic Evolution) represents an educational exploration of adaptive trading systems. Unlike traditional indicators with fixed parameters, KERS-AGE demonstrates a dynamic, evolving approach that adjusts to market conditions through genetic algorithms and machine learning techniques.
This guide explains the theoretical concepts, technical implementation, and educational examples of how the system operates.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Traditional Indicators vs. Adaptive Systems:
Traditional Indicators:
Fixed parameters
Single strategy approach
Static behavior
Designed for specific conditions
Require manual optimization
Adaptive System Approach (KERS-AGE):
Dynamic parameters (adjust based on conditions)
Multiple strategies tested simultaneously
Pattern recognition (cluster analysis)
Regime-aware (speciation)
Automated optimization (genetic algorithms)
Transparent operation (detailed dashboard)
CORE CONCEPTS EXPLAINED
1. THE ELASTICITY ANALOGY 🎯
The indicator models price behavior as if connected to a moving average by an elastic band:
Price extends away → Elastic tension builds → Potential reversion point identified
Key Measurements:
STRETCH: Distance from price to equilibrium (MA)
TENSION: Normalized force calculation
THRESHOLD: Point where multiple factors align
Theoretical Foundation:
Markets have historically shown mean-reverting tendencies around fair value. This concept quantifies the deviation and identifies potential reversal zones based on multiple confluence factors.
Mathematical Approach:
text
Tension Score = (Price Distance from MA) / (Band Width) × Volatility Scaling
Signal Threshold = Multiple of ATR × Dynamic Volatility Ratio
Confluence = Tension Score + Additional Factors
2. THE 6 SIGNAL TYPES 📊
The system recognizes 6 distinct pattern categories:
A. ELASTIC SIGNALS
Pattern: Price reaches statistical band extremes
Theory: Maximum deviation from mean suggests potential reversion
Detection: Price touches outer zones (typically 2-3× ATR from MA)
Component: Mathematical band extension measurement
Historical Context: Often observed in markets with clear swing patterns
B. WICK SIGNALS
Pattern: Extended rejection wicks on candles
Theory: Failed breakout attempts may indicate directional exhaustion
Detection: Upper/lower wick exceeding 2× body size
Component: Real-time price rejection measurement
Historical Context: Common in volatile conditions with rapid reversals
C. EXHAUSTION SIGNALS
Pattern: Decelerating momentum despite price extension
Theory: Velocity and acceleration divergence may precede reversals
Detection: Decreasing velocity with negative acceleration
Component: Momentum derivative analysis
Historical Context: Often seen at trend maturity points
D. CLIMAX SIGNALS
Pattern: Volume spike at price extreme
Theory: Unusual volume at extremes historically correlates with turning points
Detection: Volume 1.5-2.5× average at band extreme
Component: Volume-price relationship analysis
Historical Context: Associated with institutional activity or capitulation
E. STRUCTURE SIGNALS
Pattern: Fractal pivot formations (swing highs/lows)
Theory: Market structure points have historically acted as support/resistance
Detection: 2-4 bar pivot patterns
Component: Classical technical analysis
Historical Context: Universal across timeframes and markets
F. DIVERGENCE SIGNALS
Pattern: RSI divergence versus price
Theory: Momentum divergence has historically preceded price reversals
Detection: Price makes new extreme but RSI does not
Component: Oscillator divergence detection
Historical Context: Considered a leading indicator in technical analysis
Pattern Confluence:
Historical testing suggests stronger signals when multiple types align:
Elastic + Wick + Volume = Higher confluence score
Elastic + Exhaustion + Divergence = Multiple confirmation factors
Any 3+ types = Increased pattern strength
Note: Past pattern performance does not guarantee future occurrence.
3. REGIME DETECTION 🌍
The system attempts to classify market conditions into three behavioral regimes:
📈 TREND REGIME
Detection Methodology:
text
Efficiency Ratio = Net Movement / Total Movement
Classification: Efficiency > 0.5 AND Volatility < 1.3 → TREND
Characteristics Observed:
Directional price movement
Relatively lower volatility
Defined higher highs/lower lows
Persistent directional momentum
System Response:
Reduces signal frequency
Prioritizes trend-specialist strategies
Applies additional filtering to counter-trend signals
Increases confluence requirements
Educational Note:
In trending conditions, counter-trend mean reversion signals historically have shown reduced reliability. Users may consider additional confirmation when trend regime is detected.
↔️ RANGE REGIME
Detection Methodology:
text
Classification: Efficiency < 0.5 AND Volatility 0.9-1.4 → RANGE
Characteristics Observed:
Oscillating price action
Defined support/resistance zones
Mean-reverting behavior patterns
Relatively balanced directional flow
System Response:
Increases signal frequency
Activates range-specialist strategies
Adjusts bands relative to volatility
Reduces confluence threshold
Educational Note:
Historical backtesting suggests mean reversion systems have performed better in ranging conditions. This does not guarantee future performance.
🌊 VOLATILE REGIME
Detection Methodology:
text
Classification: DVS (Dynamic Volatility Scaling) > 1.5 → VOLATILE
Characteristics Observed:
Erratic price swings
Expanded ranges
Elevated ATR readings
Often news or event-driven
System Response:
Activates volatility-specialist strategies
Widens bands automatically
Prioritizes wick rejection signals
Emphasizes volume confirmation
Educational Note:
Volatile conditions historically present both opportunity and increased risk. Wider stops may be appropriate for risk management.
4. GENETIC EVOLUTION EXPLAINED 🧬
The system employs genetic algorithms to optimize parameters - an approach used in computational finance research.
The Evolution Process:
STEP 1: INITIALIZATION
text
Initial State: System creates 4 starter strategies
- Strategy 0: Range-optimized parameters
- Strategy 1: Trend-optimized parameters
- Strategy 2: Volatility-optimized parameters
- Strategy 3: Balanced parameters
Each contains 14 adjustable parameters (genes):
- Band sensitivity
- Extension multiplier
- Wick threshold
- Momentum threshold
- Volume multiplier
- Component weights (elastic, wick, momentum, volume, fractal)
- Target percentage
STEP 2: COMPETITION (Shadow Trading)
text
Early Bars: All strategies generate signals in parallel
- Each tracks hypothetical performance independently
- Simulated P&L, win rate, Sharpe ratio calculated
- No actual trades executed (educational simulation)
- Performance metrics recorded for analysis
STEP 3: FITNESS EVALUATION
text
Fitness Calculation =
0.25 × Win Rate +
0.25 × PnL Score +
0.15 × Drawdown Score +
0.30 × Sharpe Ratio Score +
0.05 × Trade Count Score
With Walk-Forward enabled:
Fitness = 0.60 × Test Score + 0.40 × Train Score
With Speciation enabled:
Fitness adjusted by Diversity Penalty
STEP 4: SELECTION (Tournament)
text
Periodically (default every 50 bars):
- Randomly select 4 active strategies
- Compare fitness scores
- Top 2 selected as "parents"
STEP 5: CROSSOVER (Breeding)
text
Parent 1 Fitness: 0.65
Parent 2 Fitness: 0.55
Weight calculation: 0.65/(0.65+0.55) = 54%
For each parameter:
Child Parameter = (0.54 × Parent1) + (0.46 × Parent2)
Example:
Band Sensitivity: (0.54 × 1.5) + (0.46 × 2.0) = 1.73
STEP 6: MUTATION
text
For each parameter:
if random(0-1) < Mutation Rate (default 0.15):
Add random variation: -12% to +12%
Purpose: Prevents premature convergence
Enables: Discovery of novel parameter combinations
ADAPTIVE MUTATION:
If population fitness converges → Mutation rate × 1.5
(Encourages exploration when diversity decreases)
STEP 7: INSERTION
text
New strategy added to population:
- Assigned unique ID number
- Generation counter incremented
- Begins shadow trading
- Competes with existing strategies
STEP 8: CULLING (Selection Pressure)
text
Periodically (default every 100 bars):
- Identify lowest fitness strategy
- Verify not elite (protected top performers)
- Verify not last of species
- Remove from population
Result: Maintains selection pressure
Effect: Prevents weak strategies from diluting signals
STEP 9: SIGNAL GENERATION LOGIC
text
When determining signals to display:
If Ensemble enabled:
- All strategies cast weighted votes
- Weights based on fitness scores
- Specialists receive boost in matching regime
- Signal generated if consensus threshold reached
If Ensemble disabled:
- Single highest-fitness strategy used
STEP 10: ADAPTATION OBSERVATION
text
Over time: Population characteristics may shift
- Lower-performing strategies removed
- Higher-performing strategies replicated
- Parameters adjust toward observed optima
- Fitness scores generally trend upward
Long-term: Population reaches maturity
- Strategies become specialized
- Parameters optimized for recent conditions
- Performance stabilizes
Educational Context:
Genetic algorithms are a recognized computational method for optimization problems. This implementation applies those concepts to trading parameter optimization. Past optimization results do not guarantee future performance.
5. SPECIATION (Niche Specialization) 🐟🦎🦅
Inspired by biological speciation theory applied to algorithmic trading.
The Three Species:
RANGE SPECIALISTS 📊
text
Optimized for: Sideways market conditions
Parameter tendencies:
- Tighter bands (1.0-1.5× ATR)
- Higher sensitivity to elastic stretch
- Emphasis on fractal structure
- More frequent signal generation
Typically emerge when:
- Range regime detected
- Clear support/resistance present
- Mean reversion showing historical success
Historical backtesting observations:
- Win rates often in 55-65% range
- Smaller reward/risk ratios (0.5-1.5R)
- Higher trade frequency
TREND SPECIALISTS 📈
text
Optimized for: Directional market conditions
Parameter tendencies:
- Wider bands (2.0-2.5× ATR)
- Focus on momentum exhaustion
- Emphasis on divergence patterns
- More selective signal generation
Typically emerge when:
- Trend regime detected
- Strong directional movement observed
- Counter-trend exhaustion signals sought
Historical backtesting observations:
- Win rates often in 40-55% range
- Larger reward/risk ratios (1.5-3.0R)
- Lower trade frequency
VOLATILITY SPECIALISTS 🌊
text
Optimized for: High-volatility conditions
Parameter tendencies:
- Expanded bands (1.5-2.0× ATR)
- Priority on wick rejection patterns
- Strong volume confirmation requirement
- Very selective signals
Typically emerge when:
- Volatile regime detected
- High DVS ratio (>1.5)
- News-driven or event-driven conditions
Historical backtesting observations:
- Win rates often in 50-60% range
- Variable reward/risk ratios (1.0-2.5R)
- Opportunistic trade timing
Species Protection Mechanism:
text
Minimum Per Species: Configurable (default 2)
If Range specialists = 1:
→ Preferential spawning of Range type
→ Protection from culling process
Purpose: Ensures coverage across regime types
Theory: Markets cycle between behavioral states
Goal: Prevent extinction of specialized approaches
Fitness Sharing:
text
If Species has 4 members:
Individual Fitness × 1 / (4 ^ 0.3)
Individual Fitness × 0.72
Purpose: Creates pressure toward species diversity
Effect: Prevents single approach from dominating population
Educational Note: Speciation is a theoretical framework for maintaining strategy diversity. Past specialization performance does not guarantee future regime classification accuracy or signal quality.
6. WALK-FORWARD VALIDATION 📈
An out-of-sample testing methodology used in quantitative research to reduce overfitting risk.
The Overfitting Problem:
text
Hypothetical Example:
In-Sample Backtest: 85% win rate
Out-of-Sample Results: 35% win rate
Explanation: Strategy may have optimized to historical noise
rather than repeatable patterns
Walk-Forward Methodology:
Timeline Structure:
text
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Train Window │ Test Window │ Train │ Test │
│ (200 bars) │ (50 bars) │ (200) │ (50) │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
In-Sample Out-of-Sample IS OOS
(Optimize) (Validate) Cycle 2...
TRAIN PHASE (In-Sample):
text
Example Bars 1-200: Strategies optimize parameters
- Performance tracked
- Not yet used for primary fitness
- Learning period
TEST PHASE (Out-of-Sample):
text
Example Bars 201-250: Strategies use optimized parameters
- Performance tracked separately
- Validation period
- Out-of-sample evaluation
FITNESS CALCULATION EXAMPLE:
text
Train Win Rate: 65%
Test Win Rate: 58%
Composite Fitness:
= (0.40 × 0.65) + (0.60 × 0.58)
= 0.26 + 0.35
= 0.61
Note: Test results weighted 60%, Train 40%
Theory: Out-of-sample may better indicate forward performance
OVERFIT DETECTION MECHANISM:
text
Gap = Train WR - Test WR = 65% - 58% = 7%
If Gap > Overfit Threshold (default 25%):
Fitness Penalty = Gap × 2
Example with 30% gap:
Strategy shows: Train 70%, Test 40%
Gap: 30% → Potential overfit flagged
Penalty: 30% × 2 = 60% fitness reduction
Result: Strategy likely to be culled
WINDOW ROLLING:
text
Example Bar 250: Test window complete
→ Reset both windows
→ Start new cycle
→ Previous results retained for analysis
Cycle Count increments
Historical performance tracked across multiple cycles
Educational Context:
Walk-forward analysis is a recognized approach in quantitative finance research for evaluating strategy robustness. However, past out-of-sample performance does not guarantee future results. Market conditions can change in ways not represented in historical data.
7. CLUSTER ANALYSIS 🔬
An unsupervised machine learning approach for pattern recognition.
The Concept:
text
Scenario: System identifies a price pivot that wasn't signaled
→ Extract pattern characteristics
→ Store features for analysis
→ Adjust detection for similar future patterns
Implementation:
STEP 1: FEATURE EXTRACTION
text
When significant move occurs without signal:
Extract 5-dimensional feature vector:
Feature Vector = [
Elastic Score (0-2),
Wick Score (0-2),
Momentum Score (0-2),
Pressure Score (0-1),
Regime (0-2)
]
Example:
Observed Pattern: [1.2, 0.8, 1.5, 0.4, 1]
STEP 2: CLUSTER ASSIGNMENT
text
Compare to existing cluster centroids using distance metric:
Cluster 0: [0.8, 0.5, 1.2, 0.3, 0]
Cluster 1: [1.5, 1.2, 0.8, 0.5, 1] ← Minimum distance
Cluster 2: [1.0, 1.8, 1.1, -0.2, 2]
...
Assign to nearest cluster
STEP 3: CENTROID UPDATE
text
Old Centroid 1: [1.5, 1.2, 0.8, 0.5, 1]
New Pattern: [1.2, 0.8, 1.5, 0.4, 1]
Decay Rate: 0.95
Updated Centroid:
= 0.95 × Old + 0.05 × New
= Exponential moving average update
= [1.485, 1.18, 0.835, 0.495, 1.0]
STEP 4: PROFIT TRACKING
text
Cluster Average Profit (hypothetical):
Old Average: 2.5R
New Observation: 3.2R
Updated: 0.95 × 2.5 + 0.05 × 3.2 = 2.535R
STEP 5: LEARNING ADJUSTMENT
text
If Cluster Average Profit > Threshold (e.g., 2.0R):
Cluster Learning Boost += increment (e.g., 0.1)
(Maximum cap: 2.0)
Effect: Future signals resembling this cluster receive adjustment
STEP 6: SCORE MODIFICATION
text
For signals matching cluster characteristics:
Base Score × Cluster Learning Boost
Example:
Base Score: 5.2
Cluster Boost: 1.3
Adjusted Score: 5.2 × 1.3 = 6.76
Result: Pattern more likely to generate signal
Cluster Interpretation Example:
text
CLUSTER 0: "High elastic, low volume"
Centroid: [1.8, 0.5, 0.6, 0.2, 0]
Avg Profit: 3.5R (historical backtest)
Interpretation: Pure elastic signals in ranges historically favorable
CLUSTER 1: "Wick rejection, volatile"
Centroid: [0.8, 1.9, 1.0, -0.3, 2]
Avg Profit: 2.8R (historical backtest)
Interpretation: Wick signals in volatility showed positive results
CLUSTER 2: "Exhaustion divergence"
Centroid: [1.2, 0.7, 1.8, 0.6, 1]
Avg Profit: 4.2R (historical backtest)
Interpretation: Momentum exhaustion in trends performed well
Learning Progress Metrics:
text
Missed Total: 47
Clusters Updated: 142
Patterns Learned: 28
Interpretation:
- System identified 47 significant moves without signals
- Clusters updated 142 times (incremental refinement)
- Made 28 parameter adjustments
- Theoretically improving pattern recognition
Educational Note: Cluster analysis is a recognized machine learning technique. This implementation applies it to trading pattern recognition. Past cluster performance does not guarantee future pattern profitability or accurate classification.
8. ENSEMBLE VOTING 🗳️
A collective decision-making approach common in machine learning.
The Wisdom of Crowds Concept:
text
Single Model:
- May have blind spots
- Subject to individual bias
- Limited perspective
Ensemble of Models:
- Blind spots may offset
- Biases may average out
- Multiple perspectives considered
Implementation:
STEP 1: INDIVIDUAL VOTES
text
Example Bar 247:
Strategy 0 (Range): LONG (fitness: 0.65)
Strategy 1 (Trend): FLAT (fitness: 0.58)
Strategy 2 (Volatile): LONG (fitness: 0.52)
Strategy 3 (Balanced): SHORT (fitness: 0.48)
Strategy 4 (Range): LONG (fitness: 0.71)
Strategy 5 (Trend): FLAT (fitness: 0.55)
STEP 2: WEIGHT CALCULATION
text
Base Weight = Fitness Score
If strategy's species matches current regime:
Weight × Specialist Boost (configurable, default 1.5)
If strategy has recent positive performance:
Weight × Recent Performance Factor
Example for Strategy 0:
Base: 0.65
Range specialist in Range regime: 0.65 × 1.5 = 0.975
Recent performance adjustment: 0.975 × 1.13 = 1.10
STEP 3: WEIGHTED TALLYING
text
LONG votes:
S0: 1.10 + S2: 0.52 + S4: 0.71 = 2.33
SHORT votes:
S3: 0.48 = 0.48
FLAT votes:
S1: 0.58 + S5: 0.55 = 1.13
Total Weight: 2.33 + 0.48 + 1.13 = 3.94
STEP 4: CONSENSUS CALCULATION
text
LONG %: 2.33 / 3.94 = 59.1%
SHORT %: 0.48 / 3.94 = 12.2%
FLAT %: 1.13 / 3.94 = 28.7%
Minimum Consensus Setting: 60%
Result: NO SIGNAL (59.1% < 60%)
STEP 5: SIGNAL DETERMINATION
text
If LONG % >= Min Consensus:
→ Display LONG signal
→ Show consensus percentage in dashboard
If SHORT % >= Min Consensus:
→ Display SHORT signal
If neither threshold reached:
→ No signal displayed
Practical Examples:
text
Strong Consensus (85%):
5 strategies LONG, 0 SHORT, 1 FLAT
→ High agreement among models
Moderate Consensus (62%):
3 LONG, 2 SHORT, 1 FLAT
→ Borderline agreement
No Consensus (48%):
3 LONG, 2 SHORT, 1 FLAT
→ Insufficient agreement, no signal shown
Educational Note: Ensemble methods are widely used in machine learning to improve model robustness. This implementation applies ensemble concepts to trading signals. Past ensemble performance does not guarantee future signal quality or profitability.
9. THOMPSON SAMPLING 🎲
A Bayesian reinforcement learning technique for balancing exploration and exploitation.
The Exploration-Exploitation Dilemma:
text
EXPLOITATION: Use what appears to work
Benefit: Leverages observed success patterns
Risk: May miss better alternatives
EXPLORATION: Try less-tested approaches
Benefit: May discover superior methods
Risk: May waste resources on inferior options
Thompson Sampling Solution:
STEP 1: BETA DISTRIBUTIONS
text
For each signal type, maintain:
Alpha = Successes + 1
Beta = Failures + 1
Example for Elastic signals:
15 wins, 10 losses
Alpha = 16, Beta = 11
STEP 2: PROBABILITY SAMPLING
text
Rather than using simple Win Rate = 15/25 = 60%
Sample from Beta(16, 11) distribution:
Possible samples: 0.55, 0.62, 0.58, 0.64, 0.59...
Rationale: Incorporates uncertainty
- Type with 5 trades: High uncertainty, wide sample variation
- Type with 50 trades: Lower uncertainty, narrow sample range
STEP 3: TYPE PRIORITIZATION
text
Example Bar 248:
Elastic sampled: 0.62
Wick sampled: 0.58
Exhaustion sampled: 0.71 ← Highest this sample
Climax sampled: 0.52
Structure sampled: 0.63
Divergence sampled: 0.45
Exhaustion type receives temporary boost
STEP 4: SIGNAL ADJUSTMENT
text
If current signal is Exhaustion type:
Score × (0.7 + 0.71 × 0.6)
Score × 1.126
If current signal is other type with lower sample:
Score × (0.7 + sample × 0.6)
(smaller adjustment)
STEP 5: OUTCOME FEEDBACK
text
When trade completes:
If WIN:
Alpha += 1
(Beta unchanged)
If LOSS:
Beta += 1
(Alpha unchanged)
Effect: Shifts probability distribution for future samples
Educational Context:
Thompson Sampling is a recognized Bayesian approach to the multi-armed bandit problem. This implementation applies it to signal type selection. The mathematical optimality assumes stationary distributions, which may not hold in financial markets. Past sampling performance does not guarantee future type selection accuracy.
10. DYNAMIC VOLATILITY SCALING (DVS) 📉
An adaptive approach where parameters adjust based on current vs. baseline volatility.
The Adaptation Problem:
text
Fixed bands (e.g., always 1.5 ATR):
In low volatility environment (vol = 0.5):
Bands may be too wide → fewer signals
In high volatility environment (vol = 2.0):
Bands may be too tight → excessive signals
The DVS Approach:
STEP 1: BASELINE ESTABLISHMENT
text
Calculate volatility over baseline period (default 100 bars):
Method options: ATR / Close, Parkinson, or Garman-Klass
Example average volatility = 1.2%
This represents "normal" for recent conditions
STEP 2: CURRENT VOLATILITY
text
Current bar volatility = 1.8%
STEP 3: DVS RATIO
text
DVS Ratio = Current / Baseline
= 1.8 / 1.2
= 1.5
Interpretation: Volatility currently 50% above baseline
STEP 4: BAND ADJUSTMENT
text
Base Band Width: 1.5 ATR
Adjusted Band Width:
Upper: 1.5 × DVS = 1.5 × 1.5 = 2.25 ATR
Lower: Same
Result: Bands expand 50% to accommodate higher volatility
STEP 5: THRESHOLD ADJUSTMENT
text
Base Thresholds:
Wick: 0.15
Momentum: 0.6
Adjusted:
Wick: 0.15 / DVS = 0.10 (easier to trigger in high vol)
Momentum: 0.6 × DVS = 0.90 (harder to trigger in high vol)
DVS Calculation Methods:
text
ATR RATIO (Simplest):
DVS = (ATR / Close) / SMA(ATR / Close, 100)
PARKINSON (Range-based):
σ = √(∑(ln(H/L))² / (4×n×ln(2)))
DVS = Current σ / Baseline σ
GARMAN-KLASS (Comprehensive):
σ = √(0.5×(ln(H/L))² - (2×ln(2)-1)×(ln(C/O))²)
DVS = Current σ / Baseline σ
ENSEMBLE (Robust):
DVS = Median(ATR_Ratio, Parkinson, Garman_Klass)
Educational Note: Dynamic volatility scaling is an approach to normalize indicators across varying market conditions. The effectiveness depends on the assumption that recent volatility patterns continue, which is not guaranteed. Past volatility adjustment performance does not guarantee future normalization accuracy.
11. PRESSURE KERNEL 💪
A composite measurement attempting to quantify directional force beyond simple price movement.
Components:
1. CLOSE LOCATION VALUE (CLV)
text
CLV = ((Close - Low) - (High - Close)) / Range
Examples:
Close at top of range: CLV = +1.0 (bullish position)
Close at midpoint: CLV = 0.0 (neutral)
Close at bottom: CLV = -1.0 (bearish position)
2. WICK ASYMMETRY
text
Wick Pressure = (Lower Wick - Upper Wick) / Range
Additional factors:
If Lower Wick > Body × 2: +0.3 (rejection boost)
If Upper Wick > Body × 2: -0.3 (rejection penalty)
3. BODY MOMENTUM
text
Body Ratio = Body Size / Range
Body Momentum = Close > Open ? +Body Ratio : -Body Ratio
Strong bullish candle: +0.9
Weak bullish candle: +0.2
Doji: 0.0
4. PATH ESTIMATE
text
Close Position = (Close - Low) / Range
Open Position = (Open - Low) / Range
Path = Close Position - Open Position
Additional adjustments:
If closed high with lower wick: +0.2
If closed low with upper wick: -0.2
5. MOMENTUM CONFIRMATION
text
Price Change / ATR
Examples:
+1.5 ATR move: +1.0 (capped)
+0.5 ATR move: +0.5
-0.8 ATR move: -0.8
COMPOSITE CALCULATION:
text
Pressure =
CLV × 0.25 +
Wick Pressure × 0.25 +
Body Momentum × 0.20 +
Path Estimate × 0.15 +
Momentum Confirm × 0.15
Volume context applied:
If Volume > 1.5× avg: × 1.3
If Volume < 0.5× avg: × 0.7
Final smoothing: 3-period EMA
Pressure Interpretation:
text
Pressure > 0.3: Suggests buying pressure
→ May support LONG signals
→ May reduce SHORT signal strength
Pressure < -0.3: Suggests selling pressure
→ May support SHORT signals
→ May reduce LONG signal strength
-0.3 to +0.3: Neutral range
→ Minimal directional bias
Educational Note: The Pressure Kernel is a custom composite indicator combining multiple price action metrics. These weightings are theoretical constructs. Past pressure readings do not guarantee future directional movement or signal quality.
USAGE GUIDE - EDUCATIONAL EXAMPLES
Getting Started:
STEP 1: Add Indicator
Open TradingView
Add KERS-AGE to chart
Allow minimum 100 bars for initialization
Verify dashboard displays Gen: 1+
STEP 2: Initial Observation Period
text
First 200 bars:
- System is in learning phase
- Signal frequency typically low
- Population evolution occurring
- Fitness scores generally increasing
Recommendation: Observe without trading during initialization
STEP 3: Signal Evaluation Criteria
text
Consider evaluating signals based on:
- Confidence percentage
- Grade assignment (A+, A, B+, B, C)
- Position within bands
- Historical win rate shown in dashboard
- Train vs. Test performance gap
Example Signal Evaluation Checklist:
Educational Criteria to Consider:
Signal appeared (⚡ arrow displayed)
Confidence level meets personal threshold
Grade meets personal quality standard
Ensemble consensus (if enabled) meets threshold
Historical win rate acceptable
Test performance reasonable vs. Train
Price location at band extreme
Regime classification appropriate for strategy
If trending: Signal direction aligns with personal analysis
Stop loss distance acceptable for risk tolerance
Position size appropriate (example: 1-2% account risk)
Note: This is an educational checklist, not trading advice. Users should develop their own criteria based on personal risk tolerance and strategy.
Risk Management Educational Examples:
POSITION SIZING EXAMPLE:
text
Hypothetical scenario:
Account: $10,000
Risk tolerance: 1.5% per trade = $150
Indicated stop distance: 1.5 ATR = $300 per contract
Calculation: $150 / $300 = 0.5 contracts
This is an educational example only, not a recommendation.
STOP LOSS EXAMPLES:
text
System provides stop level (red line)
Typically calculated as 1.5 ATR from entry
Alternative approaches users might consider:
LONG: Below recent swing low
SHORT: Above recent swing high
Users should determine stops based on personal risk management.
TAKE PROFIT EXAMPLES:
text
System provides target level (green line)
Typically calculated as price stretch × 60%
Alternative approaches users might consider:
Scale out: Partial exit at 1R, remainder at 2R
Trailing stop: Adjust stop after profit threshold
Users should determine targets based on personal strategy.
Educational Note: These are theoretical examples for educational purposes. Actual position sizing and risk management should be determined by each user based on their individual risk tolerance, account size, and trading plan.
OPTIMIZATION BY MARKET TYPE - EDUCATIONAL SUGGESTIONS
RANGE-BOUND MARKETS
Suggested Settings for Testing:
Population Size: 6-8
Min Confluence: 5.0-6.0
Min Consensus: 70%
Enable Speciation: Consider enabling
Min Per Species: 2
Theoretical Rationale:
More strategies may provide better coverage
Moderate confluence may generate more signals
Higher consensus may filter quality
Speciation may encourage range specialist emergence
Historical Backtest Observations:
Win rates in testing: Varied, often 50-65% range
Reward/risk ratios observed: 0.5-1.5R
Signal frequency: Relatively frequent
Disclaimer: Past backtesting results do not guarantee future performance.
TRENDING MARKETS
Suggested Settings for Testing:
Population Size: 4-5
Min Confluence: 6.0-7.0
Consider enabling MTF filter
MTF Timeframe: 3-5× current timeframe
Specialist Boost: 1.8-2.0
Theoretical Rationale:
Fewer strategies may adapt faster
Higher confluence may filter counter-trend noise
MTF may reduce counter-trend signals
Specialist boost may prioritize trend specialists
Historical Backtest Observations:
Win rates in testing: Varied, often 40-55% range
Reward/risk ratios observed: 1.5-3.0R
Signal frequency: Less frequent
Disclaimer: Past backtesting results do not guarantee future performance.
VOLATILE MARKETS (e.g., Cryptocurrency)
Suggested Settings for Testing:
Base Length: 25-30
Band Multiplier: 1.8-2.0
DVS: Consider enabling (Ensemble method)
Consider enabling Volume Filter
Volume Multiplier: 1.5-2.0
Theoretical Rationale:
Longer base may smooth noise
Wider bands may accommodate larger swings
DVS may be critical for adaptation
Volume filter may confirm genuine moves
Historical Backtest Observations:
Win rates in testing: Varied, often 45-60% range
Reward/risk ratios observed: 1.0-2.5R
Signal frequency: Moderate
Disclaimer: Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and risky. Past backtesting results do not guarantee future performance.
SCALPING (1-5min timeframes)
Suggested Settings for Testing:
Base Length: 15-20
Train Window: 150
Test Window: 30
Spawn Interval: 30
Min Confluence: 5.5-6.5
Consider enabling Ensemble
Min Consensus: 75%
Theoretical Rationale:
Shorter base may increase responsiveness
Shorter windows may speed evolution cycles
Quick spawning may enable rapid adaptation
Higher confluence may filter noise
Ensemble may reduce false signals
Historical Backtest Observations:
Win rates in testing: Varied, often 50-65% range
Reward/risk ratios observed: 0.5-1.0R
Signal frequency: Frequent but filtered
Disclaimer: Scalping involves high frequency trading with increased transaction costs and slippage risk. Past backtesting results do not guarantee future performance.
SWING TRADING (4H-Daily timeframes)
Suggested Settings for Testing:
Base Length: 25-35
Train Window: 300
Test Window: 100
Population Size: 7-8
Consider enabling Walk-Forward
Cooldown: 8-10 bars
Theoretical Rationale:
Longer timeframe may benefit from longer lookbacks
Larger windows may improve robustness testing
More population may increase stability
Walk-forward may be valuable for multi-day holds
Longer cooldown may reduce overtrading
Historical Backtest Observations:
Win rates in testing: Varied, often 45-60% range
Reward/risk ratios observed: 2.0-4.0R
Signal frequency: Infrequent but potentially higher quality
Disclaimer: Swing trading involves overnight and weekend risk. Past backtesting results do not guarantee future performance.
DASHBOARD GUIDE - INTERPRETATION EXAMPLES
Reading Each Section:
HEADER:
text
🧬 KERS-AGE EVOLVED 📈 TREND
Regime indication:
Color coding suggests current classification
(Green = Range, Orange = Trend, Purple = Volatile)
POPULATION:
text
Pop: 6/6
Gen: 42
Interpretation:
- Population at target size
- System at generation 42
- May indicate mature evolution
SPECIES (if enabled):
text
R:2 T:3 V:1
Interpretation:
- 2 Range specialists
- 3 Trend specialists
- 1 Volatility specialist
In TREND regime this distribution may be expected
WALK-FORWARD (if enabled):
text
Phase: 🧪 TEST
Cycles: 5
Train: 65%
Test: 58%
Considerations:
- Currently in test phase
- Completed 5 full cycles
- 7% performance gap between train and test
- Gap under default 25% overfit threshold
ENSEMBLE (if enabled):
text
Vote: 🟢 LONG
Consensus: 72%
Interpretation:
- Weighted majority voting LONG
- 72% agreement level
- Exceeds default 60% consensus threshold
SELECTED STRATEGY:
text
ID:23 [T]
Trades: 47
Win%: 58%
P&L: +8.3R
Fitness: 0.62
Information displayed:
- Strategy ID 23, Trend specialist
- 47 historical simulated trades
- 58% historical win rate
- +8.3R historical cumulative reward/risk
- 0.62 fitness score
Note: These are historical simulation metrics
SIGNAL QUALITY:
text
Conf: 78%
Grade: B+
Elastic: ████████░░
Wick: ██████░░░░
Momentum: ███████░░░
Pressure: ███████░░░
Information displayed:
- 78% confluence score
- B+ grade assignment
- Elastic component strongest
- Visual representation of component strengths
LEARNING (if enabled):
text
Missed: 47
Learned: 28
Interpretation:
- System identified 47 moves without signals
- 28 pattern adjustments made
- Suggests ongoing learning process
POSITION:
text
POS: 🟢 LONG
Score: 7.2
Current state:
- Simulated long position active
- 7.2 confluence score
- Monitor for potential exit signal
Educational Note: Dashboard displays are for informational and educational purposes. All performance metrics are historical simulations and do not represent actual trading results or future expectations.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS - EDUCATIONAL RESPONSES
Q: Why aren't signals showing?
A: Several factors may affect signal generation:
System may still be initializing (check Gen: counter)
Confluence score may be below threshold
Ensemble consensus (if enabled) may be below requirement
Current regime may naturally produce fewer signals
Filters may be active (volume, noise reduction)
Consider adjusting settings or allowing more time for evolution.
Q: The win rate seems low compared to backtesting?
A: Consider these factors:
First 200 bars typically represent learning period
Focus on TEST % rather than TRAIN % for realistic expectations
Trend regime historically shows 40-55% win rates in backtesting
Different market conditions may affect performance
System emphasizes reward/risk ratio alongside win rate
Past performance does not guarantee future results
Q: Should I take all signals?
A: This is a personal decision. Some users may consider:
Taking higher grades (A+, A) in any regime
Being more selective in trend regimes
Requiring higher ensemble consensus
Only trading during specific regimes
Paper trading extensively before live trading
Each user should develop their own signal selection criteria.
Q: Signals appear then disappear?
A: This may be expected behavior:
Default requires 2-bar persistence
Designed to filter brief spikes
Confirmation delay intended to reduce false signals
Wait for persistence requirement to be met
This is an intentional feature, not a malfunction.
Q: Test % much lower than Train %?
A: This may indicate:
Overfit detection system functioning
Gap exceeding threshold triggers penalty
Strategy may be optimizing to in-sample noise
System designed to cull such strategies
Walk-forward protection working as intended
This is a safety feature to reduce overfitting risk.
Q: The population keeps culling strategies?
A: This is part of normal evolution:
Lower-performing strategies removed periodically
Higher-performing strategies replicate
Population quality theoretically improves over time
Total culled count shows selection pressure
This is expected evolutionary behavior.
Q: Which timeframe works best?
A: Backtesting suggests 15min to 4H may be suitable ranges:
Lower timeframes may be noisier, may need more filtering
Higher timeframes may produce fewer signals
Extensive historical testing recommended for chosen asset
Each asset may behave differently
Consider paper trading across multiple timeframes
Personal testing is recommended for your specific use case.
Q: Does it work on all asset types?
A: Historical testing suggests:
Cryptocurrency: Consider longer Base Length (25-30) due to volatility
Forex: Standard settings may be appropriate starting point
Stocks: Standard settings, possibly smaller population (4-5)
Indices: Trend-focused settings may be worth testing
Each asset class has unique characteristics. Extensive testing recommended.
Q: Can settings be changed after initialization?
A: Yes, but considerations:
Population will reset
Strategies restart evolution
Learning progress resets
Consider testing new settings on separate chart first
May want to compare performance before committing
Settings changes restart the evolutionary process.
Q: Walk-Forward enabled or disabled?
A: Educational perspective:
Walk-Forward adds out-of-sample validation
May reduce overfitting risk
Results may be more conservative
Considered best practice in quantitative research
Requires more bars for meaningful data
Recommended for those concerned about robustness
Individual users should assess based on their needs.
Q: Ensemble mode or single strategy?
A: Trade-offs to consider:
Ensemble approach:
Requires consensus threshold
May have higher consistency
Typically fewer signals
Multiple perspectives considered
Single strategy approach:
More signals (varying quality)
Faster response to conditions
Higher variability
More active signal generation
Personal preference and risk tolerance should guide this choice.
ADVANCED CONSIDERATIONS
Evolution Time: Consider allowing 200+ bars for population maturity
Regime Awareness: Historical performance varies by regime classification
Confluence Range: Testing suggests 70-85% may be informative range
Ensemble Levels: 80%+ consensus historically associated with stronger agreement
Out-of-Sample Focus: Test performance may be more indicative than train performance
Learning Metrics: "Learned" count shows pattern adjustment over time
Pressure Levels: >0.4 pressure historically added confirmation
DVS Monitoring: >1.5 DVS typically widens bands and affects frequency
Species Balance: Healthy distribution might be 2-2-2 or 3-2-1, avoid 6-0-0
Timeframe Testing: Match to personal trading style, test thoroughly
Volume Importance: May be more critical for stocks/crypto than forex
MTF Utility: Historically more impactful in trending conditions
Grade Significance: A+ in trend regime historically rare and potentially significant
Risk Parameters: Standard risk management suggests 1-2% per trade maximum
Stop Levels: System stops are pre-calculated, widening may affect reward/risk
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
Genetic Algorithms in Finance:
Traditional Optimization Approaches:
Grid search: Exhaustive but computationally expensive
Gradient descent: Efficient but prone to local optima
Random search: Simple but inefficient
Genetic Algorithm Characteristics:
Explores parameter space through evolutionary process
Balances exploration (mutation) and exploitation (selection)
Mitigates local optima through population diversity
Parallel evaluation via population approach
Inspired by biological evolution principles
Academic Context: Genetic algorithms are studied in computational finance literature for parameter optimization. Effectiveness varies based on problem characteristics and implementation.
Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning:
Single Model Limitations:
May overfit to specific patterns
Can have blind spots in certain conditions
May be brittle to distribution shifts
Ensemble Theoretical Benefits:
Variance reduction through averaging
Robustness through diversity
Improved generalization potential
Widely used (Random Forests, Gradient Boosting, etc.)
Academic Context: Ensemble methods are well-studied in machine learning literature. Performance benefits depend on base model diversity and correlation structure.
Walk-Forward Analysis:
Alternative Approaches:
Simple backtest: Risk of overfitting to full dataset
Single train/test split: Limited validation
Cross-validation: May violate time-series properties
Walk-Forward Characteristics:
Continuous out-of-sample validation
Respects temporal ordering
Attempts to detect strategy degradation
Used in quantitative trading research
Academic Context: Walk-forward analysis is discussed in quantitative finance literature as a robustness check. However, it assumes future regimes will resemble recent test periods, which is not guaranteed.
FINAL EDUCATIONAL SUMMARY
KERS-AGE demonstrates an adaptive systems approach to technical analysis. Rather than fixed rules, it implements:
✓ Evolutionary Optimization: Parameter adaptation through genetic algorithms
✓ Regime Classification: Attempted market condition categorization
✓ Out-of-Sample Testing: Walk-forward validation methodology
✓ Pattern Recognition: Cluster analysis and learning systems
✓ Ensemble Methodology: Collective decision-making framework
✓ Full Transparency: Comprehensive dashboard and metrics
This indicator is an educational tool demonstrating advanced algorithmic concepts.
Critical Reminders:
The system:
✓ Attempts to identify potential reversal patterns
✓ Adapts parameters to changing conditions
✓ Provides multiple filtering mechanisms
✓ Offers detailed performance metrics
Users must understand:
✓ No system guarantees profitable results
✓ Past performance does not predict future results
✓ Extensive testing and validation recommended
✓ Risk management is user's responsibility
✓ Market conditions can change unpredictably
✓ This is educational software, not financial advice
Success in trading requires: Proper education, risk management, discipline, realistic expectations, and personal responsibility for all trading decisions.
For Educational Use
🧬 KERS-AGE Development Team
⚠️ FINAL DISCLAIMER
This indicator and documentation are provided strictly for educational and informational purposes.
NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE: Nothing in this guide constitutes financial advice, investment advice, trading advice, or any recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or to engage in any trading strategy.
NO GUARANTEES: No representation is made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown in backtests, examples, or historical data. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
SUBSTANTIAL RISK: Trading stocks, forex, futures, options, and cryptocurrencies involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you.
YOUR RESPONSIBILITY: You are solely responsible for your own investment and trading decisions. You should conduct your own research, perform your own analysis, and consult with qualified financial advisors before making any trading decisions.
NO LIABILITY: The developers, contributors, and distributors of this indicator disclaim all liability for any losses or damages, direct or indirect, that may result from use of this indicator or reliance on any information provided.
PAPER TRADE FIRST: Users are strongly encouraged to thoroughly test this indicator in a paper trading environment before risking any real capital.
By using this indicator, you acknowledge that you have read this disclaimer, understand the risks involved in trading, and agree that you are solely responsible for your own trading decisions and their outcomes.
Educational Software Only | Trade at Your Own Risk | Not Financial Advice
Taking you to school. — Dskyz, Trade with insight. Trade with anticipation.
仅限邀请脚本
只有作者授权的用户才能访问此脚本。您需要申请并获得使用许可。通常情况下，付款后即可获得许可。更多详情，请按照下方作者的说明操作，或直接联系DskyzInvestments。
TradingView不建议您付费购买或使用任何脚本，除非您完全信任其作者并了解其工作原理。您也可以在我们的社区脚本找到免费的开源替代方案。
作者的说明
This is a private, invite-only indicator. To request access, please follow the instructions on our official website: https://www.dafetradingsystems.com After completing the process on our site, send me a message
Empowering everyday traders and DAFE Trading Systems
DAFETradingSystems.com
DAFETradingSystems.com
免责声明
这些信息和出版物并非旨在提供，也不构成TradingView提供或认可的任何形式的财务、投资、交易或其他类型的建议或推荐。请阅读使用条款了解更多信息。
仅限邀请脚本
只有作者授权的用户才能访问此脚本。您需要申请并获得使用许可。通常情况下，付款后即可获得许可。更多详情，请按照下方作者的说明操作，或直接联系DskyzInvestments。
TradingView不建议您付费购买或使用任何脚本，除非您完全信任其作者并了解其工作原理。您也可以在我们的社区脚本找到免费的开源替代方案。
作者的说明
This is a private, invite-only indicator. To request access, please follow the instructions on our official website: https://www.dafetradingsystems.com After completing the process on our site, send me a message
Empowering everyday traders and DAFE Trading Systems
DAFETradingSystems.com
DAFETradingSystems.com
免责声明
这些信息和出版物并非旨在提供，也不构成TradingView提供或认可的任何形式的财务、投资、交易或其他类型的建议或推荐。请阅读使用条款了解更多信息。