开始

在脚本中搜索"bitcoin"

[Bitcoin] Lastbattle's nose pickerI've been working on a top and bottom picker script over the past couple of weeks, based on RSI of multiple timeframe closing price. It've been a pretty good trading system that's tested over the last meteoric rise from 220~270 and back down to 230 right now, and I think it should be released to the community. Sure, I'm not worried about this strategy not working anymore after it is being used by the majority. Everyone have a different view of the market, and this is more towards psychology. It'll likely to hold for as long as there are still humans trading Bitcoins. Bitcoin market is full of emotions, you'll never run out of it. So why does it work? If you take a look at the live charts offered by Bitcoinwisdom and Cryptowatch, they only offer 1, 3, 5, and 15 minute timeframe by default with no other option to switch. Naturally more traders will look at these levels for oversold and overbought condition. The same indicator does not work for the broader commodities market such as Gold and Silver. How does it work? As long as the RSI levels of 1, 3, 5, and 15 minute fulfills the oversold/overbought level, a signal will be given. The overbought/oversold level gets compensated the higher volatility the market is in. Note: ** -This is only for exit strategy. If you're on long, consider reducing or exiting your position when it displays a red. On the other hand if you're short, consider reducing or covering your shorts if it shows a green. -It may give false signal in a trending market, use your trading experience and judgement to filter them out. (eg: uptrend usually have more than 1 legs AND after a long consolidation, RSI gets to oversold/overbought easily... the market will tend to test the support/resistance again.) -This is tuned for the 15m interval, the script won't work beyond this. I use it for scalping futures. Feel free to change or remove this line 'plot(interval == 15 and ' -Even if it shows a signal, it may not be the true top/bottom. Sometimes there may be a weak diverged leg aka 'last fart', so that's one reason I dont use this for entry until more confirmation is given via other indicators. ** If your chart is zooming all the way down to 0, right click on the price at the right and select 'Scale price only' Go ahead and try this out with willy, etc and see what works better :D Credits: -LazyBear for the volatility switcher script
Pine Script®指标
由LastBattle提供
7
Bitcoin Margin Call Envelopes [saraphig & alexgrover]Bitcoin is the most well known digital currency, and allow two parties to make a transaction without the need of a central entity, this is why cryptocurrencies are said to be decentralized, there is no central unit in the transaction network, this can be achieved thanks to cryptography. Bitcoin is also the most traded cryptocurrency and has the largest market capitalization, this make it one of the most liquid cryptocurrency. There has been tons of academic research studying the profitability of Bitcoin as well as its role as a safe heaven asset, with all giving mixed conclusions, some says that Bitcoin is to risky to be considered as an hedging instrument while others highlight similarities between Bitcoin and gold thus showing evidence on the usefulness of Bitcoin acting as an hedging instrument. Yet Bitcoin seems to attract more short term speculative investors rather than other ones that would use Bitcoin as an hedging instrument. Once introduced, cryptocurrencies where of course heavily analyzed by technical analyst, and technical indicators where used by retail as well as institutional investors in order to forecast the future trends of bitcoin. I never really liked the idea of designing indicators that specifically worked for only one type of market and ever less on only one symbol. Yet the user @saraphig posted in Feb 20 an indicator called " Margin Call MovingAverage " who calculate liquidation price by using a volume weighted moving average. It took my attention and we decided to work together on a relatively more complete version that would include resistances levels. I believe the proposed indicator might result useful to some users, the code also show a way to restrict the use of an indicator to only one symbol (line 9 to 16). The Indicator The indicator only work on BTCUSD, if you use another symbol you should see the following message: The indicator plot 6 extremities, with 3 upper (resistance) extremities and 3 lower (support) extremities, each one based on the isolated margin mode liquidation price formula: UPlp = MA/Leverage × (Leverage+1-(Leverage*0.005)) for upper extremities and: DNlp = MA × Leverage/(Leverage+1-(Leverage*0.005)) for lower extremities. Length control the period of the moving averages, with higher values of length increasing the probability of the price crossing an extremity. The Leverage's settings control how far away their associated extremities are from the price, with lower values of Leverage making the extremity farther away from the price, Leverage 3 control Up3 and Dn3, Leverage 2 control Up2 and Dn2, Leverage 1 control Up1 and Dn1, @saraphig recommend values for Leverage of either : 25, 20, 15, 10 ,5. You can select 3 different types of moving average, the default moving average is the volume weighted moving average (VWMA), you can also choose a simple moving average (SMA) and the Kaufman adaptive moving average (KAMA). Based on my understanding (which could be wrong) the original indicator aim to highlight points where margin calls might have occurred, hence the name of the indicator. If you want a more "DSP" like description then i would say that each extremity represent a low-pass filter with a passband greater than 1 for upper extremities and lower than 1 for lower extremities, unlike bands indicators made by adding/subtracting a volatility indicator from another moving average this allow to conserve the original shape of the moving average, the downside of it being the inability to show properly on different scales. here length = 200, on a 1h tf, each extremities are able to detect short-terms tops and bottoms. The extremity become wider when using lower time-frames. You would then need to increase the Leverages settings, i recommend a time frame of 1h. Conclusion I'am not comfortable enough to make a conclusion, as i don't know the indicator that well, however i liked the original indicator posted by @saraphig and was curious about the idea behind it, studying the effect of margin calls on market liquidity as well as making indicators based on it might result a source of inspiration for other traders. A big thanks to @saraphig who shared a lot of information about the original indicator and allowed me to post this one. I don't exclude working with him/her in the future, i invite you to follow him/her: www.tradingview.com Thx for reading and have a nice weekend! :3
Pine Script®指标
由alexgrover提供
10
Bitcoin Miner Sell PressureBitcoin miners are in pain and now (November 2022) selling more than they have in almost 5 years! Introducing: Bitcoin Miner Sell Pressure. A free, open-source indicator which tracks on-chain data to highlight when Bitcoin miners are selling more of their reserves than usual. The indicator tracks the ratio of on-chain miner Bitcoin outflows to miner Bitcoin reserves. - Higher = more selling than usual - Lower = less selling than usual - Red = extraordinary sell pressure Today , it's red. What can we see now ? Miners are not great at treasury management. They tend to sell most when they are losing money (like today). But there have been times when they sold well into high profit, such as into the 2017 $20K top and in early 2021 when Bitcoin breached $40K. Bitcoin Miner Sell Pressure identifies industry stress, excess and miner capitulation. Unsurprisingly, there is a high correlation with Bitcoin Production Cost; giving strong confluence to both. In some instances, BMSP spots capitulation before Hash Ribbons. Such as today!
Pine Script®指标
由capriole_charles提供
8
Bitcoin Block Height (Total Blocks)Bitcoin Block Height by RagingRocketBull 2020 Version 1.0 Differences between versions are listed below: ver 1.0: compare QUANDL Difficulty vs Blockchain Difficulty sources, get total error estimate ver 2.0: compare QUANDL Hash Rate vs Blockchain Hash Rate sources, get total error estimate ver 3.0: Total Blocks estimate using different methods -------------------------------- This indicator estimates Bitcoin Block Height (Total Blocks) using Difficulty and Hash Rate in the most accurate way possible, since QUANDL doesn't provide a direct source for Bitcoin Block Height (neither QUANDL:BCHAIN, nor QUANDL:BITCOINWATCH/MINING). Bitcoin Block Height can be used in other calculations, for instance, to estimate the next date of Bitcoin Halving. Using this indicator I demonstrate: - that QUANDL data is not accurate and differ from Blockchain source data (industry standard), but still can be used in calculations - how to plot a series of data points from an external csv source and compare it with another source - how to accurately estimate Bitcoin Block Height Features: - compare QUANDL Difficulty source (EOD, D1) with external Blockchain Difficulty csv source (EOD, D1, embedded) - show/hide Quandl/Blockchain Difficulty curves - show/hide Blockchain Difficulty candles - show/hide differences (aqua vertical lines) - show/hide time gaps (green vertical lines) - count source differences within data range only or for the whole history - multiply both sources by alpha to match before comparing - floor/round both matched sources when comparing - Blockchain Difficulty offset to align sequences, bars > 0 - count time gaps and missing bars (as result of time gaps) WARNING: - This indicator hits the max 1000 vars limit, adding more plots/vars/data points is not possible - Both QUANDL/Blockchain provide daily EOD data and must be plotted on a daily D1 chart otherwise results will be incorrect - current chart must not have any time gaps inside the range (time gaps outside the range don't affect the calculation). Time gaps check is provided. Otherwise hardcoded Blockchain series will be shifted forward on gaps and the whole sequence become truncated at the end => data comparison/total blocks estimate will be incorrect Examples of valid charts that can run this indicator: COINBASE:BTCUSD,D1 (has 8 time gaps, 34 missing bars outside the range), QUANDL:BCHAIN/DIFF,D1 (has no gaps) Usage: - Description of output plot values from left to right: - c_shifted - 4x blockchain plotcandles ohlc, green/black (default na) - diff - QUANDL Difficulty - c_shifted - Blockchain Difficulty with offset - QUANDL Difficulty multiplied by alpha and rounded - Blockchain Difficulty multiplied by alpha and rounded - is_different, bool - cur bar's source values are different (1) or not (0) - count, number of differences - bars, total number of bars/data points in the range - QUANDL daily blocks - Blockchain daily blocks - QUANDL total blocks - Blockchain total blocks - total_error - difference between total_blocks estimated using both sources as of cur bar, blocks - number_of_gaps - number of time gaps on a chart - missing_bars - number of missing bars as result of time gaps on a chart - Color coding: - Blue - QUANDL data - Red - Blockchain data - Black - Is Different - Aqua - number of differences - Green - number of time gaps - by default the indicator will show lots of vertical aqua lines, 138 differences, 928 bars, total error -370 blocks - to compare the best match of the 2 sources shift Blockchain source 1 bar into the future by setting Blockchain Difficulty offset = 1, leave alpha = 0.01 => this results in no vertical aqua lines, 0 differences, total_error = 0 blocks if you move the mouse inside the range some bars will show total_error = 1 blocks => total_error <= 1 blocks - now uncheck Round Difficulty Values flag => some filled aqua areas, 218 differences. - now set alpha = 1 (use raw source values) instead of 0.01 => lots of filled aqua areas, 871 differences. although there are many differences this still doesn't affect the total_blocks estimate provided Difficulty offset = 1 Methodology: To estimate Bitcoin Block Height we need 3 steps, each step has its own version: - Step 1: Compare QUANDL Difficulty vs Blockchain Difficulty sources and estimate error based on differences - Step 2: Compare QUANDL Hash Rate vs Blockchain Hash Rate sources and estimate error based on differences - Step 3: Estimate Bitcoin Block Height (Total Blocks) using different methods in the most accurate way possible QUANDL doesn't provide block time data, but we can calculate it using the Hash Rate approximation formula: estimated Hash rate/sec H = 2^32 * D / T, where D - Difficulty, T - block time, sec 1. block time (T) can be derived from the formula, since we already know Difficulty (D) and Hash Rate (H) from QUANDL 2. using block time (T) we can estimate daily blocks as daily time / block time 3. block height (total blocks) = cumulative sum of daily blocks of all bars on the chart (that's why having no gaps is important) Notes: - This code uses Pinescript v3 compatibility framework - hash rate is in THash/s, although QUANDL falsely states in description GHash/s! THash = 1000 GHash - you can't read files, can only embed/hardcode raw data in script - both QUANDL and Blockchain sources have no gaps - QUANDL and Blockchain series are different in the following ways: - all QUANDL data is already shifted 1 bar into the future, i.e. prev day's value is shown as cur day's value => Blockchain data must be shifted 1 bar forward to match - all QUANDL diff data > 1 bn (10^12) are truncated and have last 1-2 digits as zeros, unlike Blockchain data => must multiply both values by 0.01 and floor/round the results - QUANDL sometimes rounds, other times truncates those 1-2 last zero digits to get the 3rd last digit => must use both floor/round - you can only shift sequences forward into the future (right), not back into the past (left) using positive offset => only Blockchain source can be shifted - since total_blocks is already a cumulative sum of all prev values on each bar, total_error must be simple delta, can't be also int(cum()) or incremental - all Blockchain values and total_error are na outside the range - move you mouse cursor on the last bar/inside the range to see them TLDR, ver 1.0 Conclusion: QUANDL/Blockchain Difficulty source differences don't affect total blocks estimate, total error <= 1 block with avg 150 blocks/day is negligible Both QUANDL/Blockchain Difficulty sources are equally valid and can be used in calculations. QUANDL is a relatively good stand in for Blockchain industry standard data. Links: QUANDL difficulty source: www.quandl.com QUANDL hash rate source: www.quandl.com Blockchain difficulty source (export data as csv): www.blockchain.com
Pine Script®指标
由RagingRocketBull提供
3
Bitcoin Kill ZonesGRAB THE LASTEST VERSION HERE: ********************* This indicator shows when the candle is entering New York, London or Asia Kill Zone (open market). gray: 30min before market opens. red, green, orange: First 1 hour with 10min focus bands. silver: complete 30min session market until close. FIX NOTE: Set this hours for Asia to fix the 1 hour difference: 2330-0000 0000-0010 0010-0050 0050-0100 0100-0900 * this is beta, in planning to mark dynamically ranges before/after open/close session and use some Fibs to have some ripple effect indicator Updated code: github.com
Pine Script®指标
由oscarvs提供
7
Bitcoin Economics Adaptive MultipleBEAM (Bitcoin Economics Adaptive Multiple) is an indicator that assesses the valuation of Bitcoin by dividing the current price of Bitcoin by a moving average of past prices. Its purpose is to provide insights into whether Bitcoin is under or overvalued at any given time. The thresholds for the buy and sell zones in BEAM are adjustable, allowing users to customize the indicator based on their preferences and trading strategies. BEAM categorizes Bitcoin's valuation into two distinct zones: the green buy zone and the red sell zone. Green Buy Zone: The green buy zone in BEAM indicates that Bitcoin is potentially undervalued. Traders and investors may interpret this zone as a favorable buying opportunity. The threshold for the buy zone can be adjusted to suit individual preferences or trading strategies. Red Sell Zone: The red sell zone in BEAM suggests that Bitcoin is potentially overvalued. Traders and investors may consider selling their Bitcoin holdings during this zone to secure profits or manage risk. The threshold for the sell zone is adjustable, allowing users to adapt the indicator based on their trading preferences. Methodology: BEAM calculates the indicator value using the following formula: beam = math.log(close / ta.sma(close, math.min(count, 1400))) / 2.5 The calculation involves taking the natural logarithm of the ratio between the current price of Bitcoin and a simple moving average of past prices. The moving average period used is a minimum of the specified count or 1400, providing a suitable historical reference for valuation assessment. The resulting value of BEAM provides a standardized measure that can be compared across different time periods. By adjusting the thresholds for the buy and sell zones, users can customize BEAM to their preferred levels of undervaluation and overvaluation. Utility: BEAM serves as a tool for investors in the Bitcoin market, offering insights into Bitcoin's valuation and potential buying or selling opportunities. By monitoring BEAM, market participants can gauge whether Bitcoin is potentially undervalued or overvalued, helping them make informed decisions regarding their Bitcoin positions. It is important to note that BEAM should be used in conjunction with other technical and fundamental analysis tools to validate signals and avoid relying solely on this indicator for trading decisions. Additionally, traders and investors are encouraged to adjust the threshold values based on their specific trading strategies, risk tolerance, and market conditions. Credit: The BEAM (Bitcoin Economics Adaptive Multiple) indicator was originally developed by BitcoinEcon
Pine Script®指标
由EliCobra提供
3
Bitcoin Limited Growth ModelThe Bitcoin Limeted Growth is a model proposed by QuantMario that offers an alternative approach to estimating Bitcoin's price based on the Stock-to-Flow (S2F) ratio. This model takes into account the limitations of the traditional S2F model and introduces refinements to enhance its analysis. The S2F model is commonly used to analyze Bitcoin's price by considering the scarcity of the asset, measured by the stock (existing supply) relative to the flow (new supply). However, the LGS-S2F Bitcoin Price Formula recognizes the need for improvements and presents an updated perspective on Bitcoin's price dynamics. Invalidation of the Normal S2F Model: The normal S2F model has faced criticisms and challenges. One of the limitations is its assumption of a linear relationship between the S2F ratio and Bitcoin's price, overlooking potential nonlinearities and other market dynamics. Additionally, the normal S2F model does not account for external influences, such as market sentiment, regulatory developments, and technological advancements, which can significantly impact Bitcoin's price. Addressing the Issues: The LGS-S2F Bitcoin Price Formula introduces refinements to address the limitations of the traditional S2F model. These refinements aim to provide a more comprehensive analysis of Bitcoin's price dynamics: Nonlinearity: The LGS-S2F model recognizes that the relationship between the S2F ratio and Bitcoin's price may not be linear. It incorporates a logistic growth function that considers the diminishing returns of scarcity and the saturation of market demand. Data Analysis: The LGS-S2F model employs statistical analysis and data-driven techniques to validate its predictions. It leverages historical data and econometric modeling to support its analysis of Bitcoin's price. Utility: The LGS-S2F Bitcoin Price Formula offers insights for traders and investors in the cryptocurrency market. By incorporating a more refined approach to analyzing Bitcoin's price, this model provides an alternative perspective. It allows market participants to consider various factors beyond the S2F ratio alone, potentially aiding in their decision-making processes. Key Features: Adjustable Coefficients Sigma calculation methods: Normal or Stdev Credit: The LGS-S2F Bitcoin Price Formula was developed by QuantMario, who has contributed to the field of cryptocurrency analysis through their research and modeling efforts.
Pine Script®指标
由EliCobra提供
2
Bitcoin as % Global M2 signalThis script provides signal system: Buy signal: each time the YoY of the Global M2 rises more than 2.5% while the distance between the bitcoin price as a percentage of the Global M2 is below its yearly SMA. Sell signal: the distance between the bitcoin price as a percentage of the Global M2 and its yearly SMA is > 0.7 This is a very simple system, but it seems to work pretty well to ride the bitcoin price cycle wave. The parameters are hard coded but they can be easily changed to test different levels for both the buy and sell signals.
Pine Script®指标
由UnderstandingBitcoinPrice提供
2
Bitcoin Cycle High/Low with functional Alert [heswaikcrypt]Introduction Just as machines are fine-tuned for maximum efficiency, trading indicators must evolve to meet the demands of ever-changing markets. Credit goes to the initial author, @NoCreditsLeft I only improved the existing Pi-cycle indicator with a functional alert and included a bull mode indicator in the script. The alert can help you get a live alert at candle close when the cycle tops, bottoms, and the potential bull phase switch occurs. Philip Swift’s Pi Cycle Top Indicator is a brilliant example of leveraging mathematical relationships to signal critical turning points in Bitcoin’s price cycles. Historically, it has identified market and local tops with some relative accuracy, often within three days, as demonstrated in all the previous bull run cycles. At its core, the Pi Cycle Indicator derives its name from the mathematical constant π (pi), achieved by using simple moving averages (MAs) in a specific ratio: 𝜋 = Long MA/short MA The Bull mode switch is calculated using a crossover of the short exponentia moving average and the long moving average. . . . Knowing when Bitcoin reaches its top—and receiving timely alerts about it—is crucial for successful trading. The indicator is designed to signal; Potential Bitcoin tops: Purple label Potential Bitcoin bottoms : green Label, and Parabolic swing : Yellow diamond shape (relating to the market switching to a potential bull mode) "Please note: This indicator is tailored for Bitcoin using historical data analysis and should not be considered definitive. However accurate it might be." Setting alerts To set the alert conditions, select any alert function call to get alert whenever the conditions are met. The script is configured on dialy TF; you can set it on 1D or weekly TF. Enjoy and Trade smartly
Pine Script®指标
由Heswaikcrypt提供
1
Bitcoin wave modelBitcoin wave model is based on the logarithmic regression model and the sinusoidal waves, induced by the halving events. This chart presents the outcome of an in-depth analysis of the complete set of Bitcoin price data available from October 2009 to August 2023. The central concept is that the logarithm of the Bitcoin price closely adheres to the logarithmic regression model. If we plot the logarithm of the price against the logarithm of time, it forms a nearly straight line. The parameters of this model are provided in the script as follows: log (BTCUSD) = 1.48 + 5.44log(h). The secondary concept involves employing the inherent time unit of Bitcoin instead of days: 'h' denotes a slightly adjusted time measurement intrinsic to the Bitcoin blockchain. It can be approximated as (days since the genesis block) * 0.0007. Precisely, 'h' is defined as follows: h = 0 at the genesis block, h = 1 at the first halving block, and so forth. In general, h = block height / 210,000. Adjustments are made to account for variations in block creation time. The third concept revolves around investigating halving waves triggered by supply shock events resulting from the halvings. These halvings occur at regular intervals in Bitcoin's native time 'h'. All halvings transpire when 'h' is an integer. These events induce waves with intervals denoted as h = 1. Consequently, we can model these waves using a sin(2pih - a) function. The parameter determining the time shift is assessed as 'a = 0.4', aligning with earlier expectations for halving events and their subsequent outcomes. The fourth concept introduces the notion that the waves gradually diminish in amplitude over the progression of "time h," diminishing at a rate of 0.7^h. Lastly, we can create bands around the modeled sinusoidal waves. The upper band is derived by multiplying the sine wave by a factor of 3.1*(1-0.16)^h, while the lower band is obtained by dividing the sine wave by the same factor, 3.1*(1-0.16)^h. The current bandwidth is 2.5x. That means that the upper band is 2.5 times the lower band. These bands are forming an exceptionally narrow predictive channel for Bitcoin. Consequently, a highly accurate estimation of the peak of the next cycle can be derived. The prediction indicates that the zenith past the fourth halving, expected around the summer of 2025, could result in prices ranging between 200,000 and 240,000 USD. Enjoy the mathematical insights!
Pine Script®指标
由leoum提供
9
Bitcoin Logarithmic Fractal Growth Model By ARUDDThis model, which I'm calling the Logarithmic Fractal Growth Mode (L.F.G) , uses Bitcoin's mathematical monetary policy to evaluate the future possible price valuation. It takes into account fractal (and logarithmic) growth as well as how those who hold bitcoins might react to certain events such as changes in supply and demand. It also shows that it is mathematically logical that someday it must become stable. The information gained from knowing this helps people make more informed decisions when buying bitcoin and thinking of its future possibilities. The model can serve as some type of general guideline for determining how much bitcoins should be worth in the future if it follows a certain path from its current price. Modeling Bitcoin's money supply mathematically, and knowing that there is a finite number of them, makes this whole process much more rational than just thinking about the possibilities in pure subjective terms. Before going any further I want to say that no one can know with absolute certainty what will happen to bitcoins price in the future, but using mathematics gives us an idea of where things are headed. The results presented here are based on very reasonable assumptions for how bitcoin might continue to grow (and then level out) once there are over 21 million bitcoins in existence. The model shows that bitcoin's price can never go down to zero (thus creating the "death spiral" phenomenon), and as such, bitcoin has an extremely high probability of becoming stable as it approaches infinity. Conversely, this model also shows that at some point there is a high probability that bitcoin will not continue to grow exponentially forever. Credit goes to Quantadelic for the awesome original script. ARUDD
Pine Script®指标
由AriRudd提供
10